Case Summary
Canara Bank is the Plaintiff represented by its Manager, Athul Mohan. The Defendants are Bindhya.M.Ravi and Raveendran.S., related as daughter and father, respectively, regarding the execution of a decree.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition as it was not pressed by the decree holder. The case did not proceed further due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Vide CF No. 2128/25. Petition dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bindhya.M.Ravi
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raveendran.S.
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Udayabhanu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Bindhya.M.Ravi et al regarding Execution Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Bindhya.M.Ravi et al regarding Execution Petition