Similar Cases
Based on: S.T. No. 55/2022 — Case between Mohammed Avukkal @ Mahamood A. vs A1 White Ray Consortium et al regarding cheque dishonor
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
S.T. No. 58/2023
Case between Suresh N.K. vs Janardhanan regarding dishonor of cheque
The complainant, Suresh N.K., filed a private complaint against Janardhanan for issuing a dishonored cheque. The court found the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
ST. 36/2024
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Biju M. regarding U/s.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
The complainant, Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt. Ltd., filed a case against the accused, Biju M., for an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled as the accused paid the entire cheque amount to the complainant.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST. 91/2024
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Prakash M. K. regarding U/s.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act
Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt. Ltd. is the complainant against Prakash M. K. The matter involved a withdrawal petition filed by the complainant after the cheque amount was received.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
ST 17/2023
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt Ltd. vs Sandosh P. K. regarding withdrawal of cheque amount
Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt Ltd. filed a withdrawal petition. The matter was settled and the accused was acquitted.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
S.T. No. 35/2023
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt Ltd. vs Moidu M.K regarding dishonor of cheque under NI Act
This case involves a complaint filed by Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt Ltd. against Moidu M.K for dishonoring a cheque issued in payment of a debt. The complainant alleges that the cheque was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
S.T. No. 8/2025
Case between Kavitha M. M. vs Kunnummal Sathyan V. V. regarding dishonor of cheque
The case involves a complaint by Kavitha M. M. against Kunnummal Sathyan V. V. for dishonor of a cheque amounting to Rs. 8,00,000. The accused was accused of failing to pay the complainant after a cheque was issued and subsequently dishonored.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST. 14/2025
Case between Niravath Jubily Chits India, Pvt. Ltd. vs Shinoj V. P. regarding U/s.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Niravath Jubily Chits India, Pvt. Ltd. is the complainant represented by Shaju T. P., while Shinoj V. P. is the accused. The matter was settled and the accused was acquitted.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T. No. 66/2024
Case between N. V. Muhammad vs Team Care & Cure Pvt. Ltd et al regarding dishonor of cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The complainant N. V. Muhammad filed a private complaint against Team Care & Cure Pvt. Ltd and its Managing Director Ali Muhammad Sameer for dishonoring cheques issued for rent arrears. The case involves a transaction related to a lease agreement and multiple dishonored cheques.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST. 38/2025
Case between M/S Kalpetta Janakshema Maruthi Chits Pvt. Ltd. vs Ashokan Varayalil regarding U/s.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
The case involves M/S Kalpetta Janakshema Maruthi Chits Pvt. Ltd. as the complainant and Ashokan Varayalil as the accused. The complainant was not present, and it was reported that the company is liquidated, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST. 34/2024
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Sunil Eralott regarding offence under Negotiable Instruments Act
The complainant is Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt. Ltd. represented by Nishad K.M., while the accused is Sunil Eralott. The matter was settled, and the accused was acquitted.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T. No:57/2012
Case between Aboobacker vs Abdul Rasak regarding cheque dishonour
Complainant Aboobacker filed a case against accused Abdul Rasak under section 138 of N.I. Act. The court acquitted the accused after the complainant withdrew the complaint.
Criminal Case - Cheque dishonour
ST No:36/2014
Case between Abdul Jabbar vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding cheque dishonour
Complainant Abdul Jabbar alleged that the accused Muhammed Abdul Noor issued a cheque that was returned due to insufficient funds, leading to an offense under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
ST. No. 26/2014
Case between Muneerudheen P. vs Hamza Master regarding Cheque Dishonour
Complainant Muneerudheen accused Hamza Master of cheque dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act. The court acquitted the accused as the complainant withdrew the complaint.
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Defendant Won
S.T. No:58/2015
Case between Satheesh vs Sandya regarding Cheque Dishonour
Complainant Satheesh filed a case against Sandya alleging an offense under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. The court allowed the complainant to withdraw the case, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Defendant Won
S.T. No:33/2015
Case between E.M.Purushothaman vs Baiju regarding cheque dishonour under Negotiable Instruments Act
Complainant, E.M.Purushothaman, accused Baiju involved in a cheque dishonour case under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Defendant Won
S.T. No:80/2015
Case between Shaji P.P. vs Shanmughan V.P. et al regarding dishonour of cheque
Complainant alleges dishonour of cheque u/s 138 of N.I. Act. Accused found not guilty and acquitted under Cr.P.C. section 256(1).
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour (138 N.I. Act)
Defendant Won
ST.110/2015
Case between Shahul Hameed vs K Kunjimon regarding Cheque Dishonour
Complaint filed for cheque dishonour u/s 138 of N.I. Act. Complainant withdrew the complaint leading to accused acquittal.
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Defendant Won
ST.8/2014
Case between Haris.T.E. vs Semeer regarding cheque dishonour
Complaint filed against accused for dishonouring a cheque issued to the complainant. Accused found guilty and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.4,00,000 or face 5 months of simple imprisonment.
Civil Suit - Cheque Dishonour
Plaintiff Won
S.T. No:44/2016
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Mansoor regarding dishonour of cheque
A case filed against Mansoor by Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd for dishonour of cheque under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Defendant Won
S.T. No: 114/2015
Case between Mrs. Savitha.K.V et al vs Sri. Rahmathui et al regarding cheque dishonour
Complaint filed by Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Private Ltd against Sri. Rahmathui for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act. The accused pleaded not guilty and was acquitted under section 257 Cr.P.C.
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Defendant Won
S.T. No:12/2016
Case between Murali vs Jishi P. regarding dishonour of cheque
Complainant Murali filed a case against the accused Jishi P. under section 138 of N.I. Act. The accused pleaded not guilty and was subsequently acquitted.
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Defendant Won
S.T. No:137/2015
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Haneefa. M regarding offence under N.I. Act.
Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd filed a private complaint against Haneefa. M for an alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant was permitted to withdraw the complaint, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T. No:113/2015
Case between Moitheen Ottayil vs A.Noushad regarding dishonor of negotiable instrument
Complainant Moitheen Ottayil accused A.Noushad of dishonoring a negotiable instrument under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The accused pleaded not guilty and was later acquitted.
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Defendant Won
S.T. No:49/2016
Case between Shihab vs Abdul Gafoor regarding cheque dishonour
Complaint filed by Shihab against Abdul Gafoor for cheque dishonour under section 138 of N.I. Act. Accused acquitted due to company not being named as an accused and lack of evidence.
Cheque Dishonour - N.I. Act
Defendant Won
S.T. No:88/2017
Case between Basheer. C vs Nishaj Babu regarding Cheque Dishonour
Complainant Basheer filed a case against accused Nishaj for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. Accused is acquitted as complainant failed to present evidence.
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Defendant Won
S.T. No: 146/2017
Case between Mohammed Rafi vs Mohammed Shereef regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act
This case involves a complaint filed by Mohammed Rafi against Mohammed Shereef for an offence under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, related to bounced cheques.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
ST No:44/2017
Case between Shaijal Babu vs Abdul Razak. T.K regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act
Complaint filed by Shaijal Babu against Abdul Razak T.K for dishonour of cheque. Accused acquitted under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case
ST No: 183/2017
Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding offense under U/s. 138 of N.I. Act
Complaint filed by Abdu Rahman against Ajeesh for offense under U/s. 138 of N.I. Act. Complainant withdrew the complaint, and accused was acquitted.
Criminal Case
S.T. No: 174/2017
Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act
Complaint filed by Abdu Rahman against Ajeesh for offense u/s. 138 N.I. Act. Complainant allowed to withdraw complaint, accused acquitted.
Unknown
S.T. No:41/2016
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd et al vs Mohammed Faisal. P.K regarding U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act
This case involves a complaint by Sree. Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd against Mohammed Faisal. P.K for an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused issued a cheque that was dishonored, leading to the complaint.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
S.T. No:129/2015
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd vs Fathima Suhara regarding u/s. 138 of N.I. Act
Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd filed a complaint against Fathima Suhara alleging the commission of an offense under the Negotiable Instrument Act. The complainant sought permission to withdraw the complaint, which was granted by the court.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T. No:1/2017
Case between Bismi Marketing Company vs Franci. P.J regarding offense under N.I. Act
Bismi Marketing Company filed a complaint against Franci. P.J alleging the commission of an offense under the Negotiable Instrument Act. The complaint was later withdrawn by the complainant, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T. No:36/2017
Case between Kochukunhan. K.K vs Ayisha Beevi regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act
Kochukunhan filed a complaint against Ayisha Beevi alleging that she issued a cheque which bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found Ayisha Beevi guilty of the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
S.T No. 60 of 2017
Case between Shahul Hameed vs Veerankutty regarding dishonour of cheque
Shahul Hameed is the complainant against Veerankutty, who is accused of dishonouring a cheque under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the accused guilty and imposed a sentence along with financial compensation to the complainant.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
S.T. No:61/2017
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd vs Saheera Banu. K.C regarding dishonor of cheque under Negotiable Instrument Act.
Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd filed a complaint against Saheera Banu. K.C for the dishonor of a cheque issued to discharge a debt. The accused was found guilty under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and convicted.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No. 04/2023
Case between M/s. Nambiattududy Modern Rice Mill et al vs M/s. Asif Stores et al regarding money
The plaintiffs, a partnership firm and its partners, are suing the defendants for unpaid debts from grocery items purchased. The defendants issued cheques that were dishonored due to insufficient funds.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 209/2020
Case between Buhuleyan V.V vs Shaji P.S regarding loan recovery
Buhuleyan V.V is the plaintiff who loaned Rs. 5,50,000 to Shaji P.S for purchasing gymnasium machinery, but the loan was not repaid. The cheque issued in repayment was dishonored.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
os. No.20/2018
Case between PEPCO vs P. P Corporation regarding realization of money
The plaintiff, PEPCO, is seeking to recover money from the defendant, P. P Corporation, for dishonored cheques related to the purchase of tissue papers. The defendant failed to appear in court, leading to a decision in favor of the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No 383/2018
Case between Rajan.M vs M/s.Thanima Marbles et al regarding recovery of money
The plaintiff, Rajan.M, is suing the defendants, including M/s.Thanima Marbles, for recovery of money based on dishonored cheques. The defendants claimed that the case is barred by law of limitation as the suit was filed after the limitation period.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.610/2019
Case between Mohammed Yousuf vs Fakrudeen Bava regarding realization of money
Mohammed Yousuf, represented by his power of attorney holder Shine Yousef, is suing his brother Fakrudeen Bava for dishonoring a cheque issued for the repayment of collected rents. The plaintiff claims the defendant acted contrary to his interests, leading to the case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 81/2024
Case between CHORANGAD EECHALI ABU HAJI, BALAKRISHNAN vs VALAYAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
The plaintiffs, CHORANGAD EECHALI ABU HAJI and BALAKRISHNAN, filed a suit against VALAYAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH and the Secretary of the Gramapanchayath. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 132/2022
Case between Nanu Arettummal vs Narayani Nellikunnummal et al regarding partition and separate possession
Nanu Arettummal, the plaintiff, is seeking partition of the jointly owned property after the death of his father. The defendants are opposing this claim, stating the property is not identifiable and they're not in joint ownership with the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 27/2022
Case between Shoukkath. O. P vs Puthanpurayil Sasidharan regarding eviction of tenant for bonafide need.
The petitioners, Shoukkath. O. P and his wife Fousiya. C, seek to evict the respondent Puthanpurayil Sasidharan from a shop room they own, asserting a bonafide need for the space to start a business. The respondent claims to be a tenant and disputes the need for eviction.
Rent Control Petition
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 26/2024
Case between Balan vs Vinil Babu regarding specific performance of a promise
The plaintiffs, Balan and Sarojini, are seeking a decree for specific performance against their son, Vinil Babu, regarding a property gifted to him for securing a loan. The defendant has breached the agreement to reconvey the property upon settling the loan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 151/2023
Case between ASHOKAN vs THE VATTOLI NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE et al regarding suit dismissal for default
The plaintiff ASHOKAN filed a suit against THE VATTOLI NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE and its members. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP/122/2024
Case between Kavilumpara Rural Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society vs Likesh regarding execution petition.
Kavilumpara Rural Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society is the petitioner and Likesh is the respondent in this execution petition. The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the decree holder and no fresh steps taken against the judgment debtor.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 250/2023
Case between IRINGANNOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., et al vs SUSHANTH. T, ARUN, SHAJEEV regarding execution of decree debt
The case involves an execution petition filed by IRINGANNOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. against three judgment debtors, SUSHANTH. T, ARUN, and SHAJEEV, for recovery of a decree debt of ₹60,545. The judgment debtors have claimed they lack the means to pay the debt, while the bank asserts they have sufficient means.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 103/2024
Case between Reena vs Radhakrishnan. P. K et al regarding settlement of suit
Reena, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Radhakrishnan. P. K and others. The matter was settled between the parties through mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won