Similar Cases
Based on: O.S No. 201/2018 — Case between Mani P.R @ Maniappan et al vs Kalamassery Municipality et al regarding dismissal for default
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O.S. No. 1305/2020
Case between A.S Mohanan vs Lakshmi et al regarding settlement of the suit
A.S Mohanan and Dhanalakshmi are the plaintiffs, while Lakshmi, Mani, Surendran, Latha, and Santhosh are the defendants. The case is about a suit that was settled through mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1265/2020
Case between Aleyamma Varghese vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding non-prosecution of suit
Aleyamma Varghese filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 347/2019
Case between Sivaraman Menon vs Maradu Municipality regarding injunction for advertisement boards
The plaintiffs, Sivaraman Menon and Junaid, seek a permanent injunction against Maradu Municipality to prevent the removal of advertisement boards installed on their property. The Municipality alleges the boards are unauthorized and illegal, claiming the plaintiffs failed to comply with tax regulations.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 974/2024
Case between Rajesh V. Thomas et al vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding dismissal of suit
The plaintiffs, Rajesh V. Thomas, Thomas V.V, and Daisy Thomas, filed a suit against the Thrikkakara Municipality and other government officials. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. .1531/2019
Case between Jobin Thomas vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Jobin Thomas, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Thrikkakara Municipality and Abdul Razak P.K. The case revolves around unauthorized demolition of property boundaries and potential construction disputes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 346/2024
Case between Coconut Grove Residents Association vs Maradu Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The Coconut Grove Residents Association, represented by its Secretary Dr. Stephen Puthumana, filed a suit against Maradu Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the Municipality from interfering with the private road maintained by the Association. The Municipality issued a notice demanding proof of road ownership and threatened to remove a cross bar installed to control unauthorized access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 725/2022
Case between Anitha Kumari K.G et al vs Unnikrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Anitha Kumari K.G and Anil Kumar K.G, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the first defendant, Unnikrishnan, related to a goat shed operating unlawfully nearby. They claim the shed has caused severe air and water pollution, affecting their health and living conditions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 1320/2016
Case between M.K.Crown vs Thrikkakara Muncipality et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiff, M.K.Crown, claims ownership of certain property and is seeking a declaration and injunction against the defendants, including Thrikkakara Muncipality, who issued directives affecting his property rights. The defendants argue that the property in question is a public pathway and seek dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S No. 145/2017
Case between Sajeevan vs Ratheesh et al regarding mandatory and temporary prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sajeevan, is seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants for alleged violations of the Kerala Municipality Building Rules regarding construction. The defendants include Ratheesh and the Corporation of Kochi, who argued that the suit is not maintainable under the Kerala Municipality Act.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 349 / 2024
Case between Mokim Ali vs Kochi Municipal Corporation regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mokim Ali is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Kochi Municipal Corporation. The plaintiff fears illegal eviction from the property they are leasing to conduct a scrap collection business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 278 OF 2015
Case between P. Yahutty haji vs Tirur Municipality et al regarding partition.
P. Yahutty haji filed a suit for partition against Tirur Municipality and Siddeeq. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 1573/2016
Case between Maraud Municipality vs Joseph regarding payment of compensation
The case involves Maraud Municipality represented by its secretary Mohammed Arif Khan as the Decree Holder against Joseph, the Judgment Debtor. The matter pertains to the realisation of a compensation amount as per the decree.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
OS.No.1605/2022
Case between Ravikrishnan N.R vs Secretary, Alappuzha Municipality regarding a civil suit
Ravikrishnan N.R filed a suit against the Secretary and Alappuzha Municipality. The court ruled that the plaint is rejected due to a lack of remitted court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No. 516/2023
Case between M/s Palm World Manufacturing Unit vs The Secretary, Muncipal Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram regarding suit dismissal for default
M/s Palm World Manufacturing Unit represented by Ajith Kumar.K filed a suit against The Secretary, Municipal Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram and The Chairman, Kelpalm Facility Centre. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.760/2024
Case between Sandeep. N vs Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation et al regarding withdrawal of suit
Sandeep. N is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Thiruvananthapuram Municipal Corporation and others. The plaintiff has withdrawn from the suit without liberty to file a fresh suit on the same matter.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.318/2021
Case between Kerala Muncipal Corporation Workers and Employees Congress vs N.Sreekantan, Mukunda Devan Nair et al regarding dismissal of suit.
The plaintiff, Kerala Muncipal Corporation Workers and Employees Congress, was absent during the proceedings. The defendants were present, and as there was no representation from the plaintiff, the court decided to dismiss the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 154/2020
Case between M. K. Vineesh vs Kozhikode Municipal Corporation et al regarding dismissal for default.
M. K. Vineesh is the plaintiff in this case against Kozhikode Municipal Corporation and the Executive Engineer, Urban Planning Department. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not represented in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 294/2018
Case between Sainu B vs B Shamsunahar et al regarding the existence of a partnership firm
Sainu B, the 4th defendant, filed a petition arguing that O.S.294/2018 should be stayed due to overlapping issues with another pending suit, O.S.44/2018, regarding the dissolution of a partnership firm. The Municipality is involved as a counter petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 579/2023
Case between Haji Muhammed Rafeeq vs Secretary, Municipality of Kottayam et al regarding dismissal of suit
Haji Muhammed Rafeeq is the plaintiff, and he has filed a suit against the Secretary of the Municipality of Kottayam and Baiju S. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 316/2019
Case between Kollam Municipal Corporation vs Rajesh et al regarding mandatory injunction.
The case involves the Kollam Municipal Corporation as the plaintiff and Rajesh along with others as defendants, focusing on a mandatory injunction. The plaintiff failed to comply with court orders, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 1056/2005
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
The plaintiffs, T.O Abraham and Binu Zacharia, were involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, T.O Aleyas and Binoj T. Baby. The matter was settled, and the court dismissed the case as the plaintiff was not present.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
O.S No. 997/2024
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
Plaintiffs include Ammini M.N, Indraja, and Neeraja represented by Ammini M.N, and Defendants include Sindhu, Max Life Insurance Company Ltd., Life Insurance Corporation of India, Royal Swayam Sahaya Sangham, Brothers Swayam Sahaya Sangham, and St. Joseph's Avashatha Nivarana Sangham.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 863/2014
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
Plaintiff Kunju Bava aged 53, S/o. Haidrose Kutti, and defendant C. A Abdulla aged 66, S/o. Abubacker, involved in a dispute over properties in Elamkulam village purchased in 1995. Plaintiff seeking specific performance of agreement dated 26.06.2011
Civil Suit
O.S No. 733/2014
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
In the matter of Nithya vs Babu et al, the plaintiff was not ready for evidence in the listed case, leading to dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 493/2012
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
Case between Prakash Pai, his family members versus Saju, his family members. Suit dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh suit.
Civil Suit
O.S No. 240/2014
Case between Newja N. Joy et al vs Mrs. Lilly et al regarding fixation of boundary, injunction and consequential reliefs
Case involves plaintiffs claiming ownership of property bought from defendants 1 to 3. Dispute arose due to trespassing and boundary issues. Plaintiffs seek to fix boundary and seek injunction against defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.539/2020
Case between M/s Kerala Gramin Bank, Cheranellore Branch, Cheranellore vs Manu Gopi et al regarding Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
Plaintiff is M/s Kerala Gramin Bank, Cheranellore Branch represented by Deepthi Prakash. Defendants are Manu Gopi et al. The suit was decreed based on the terms of a successful Mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.309/2021
Case between Sree Narayana Sevika Samajam et al vs Pulikkal Medical Foundation et al regarding Suit filed Under Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
In the matter of Sree Narayana Sevika Samajam vs Pulikkal Medical Foundation regarding a suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff was absent and had no representation. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff did not intend to proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.68/2024
Case between Reji Mathew et al vs Divya Deepak regarding Non-payment of Balance Court Fee
Case between Reji Mathew and others against Divya Deepak regarding non-payment of balance court fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 10/2008
Case between K.C.George et al vs. Divakaran et al regarding boundary fixation, possession recovery, and injunction
Plaintiffs include K.C.George et al, seeking boundary fixation, recovery of possession, and injunction against Divakaran et al.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 546/2018
Case between Yamuna Paul vs K.A Balan et al regarding Absence of Plaintiff
Plaintiff Yamuna Paul, W/o. Paul John, aged 45 years, failed to appear for the case. Judgment was given in favor of defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.245/2018
Case between P R Radhakrishnan et al vs Sree Narayana Dharma Samajam et al regarding declaration and injunction
Plaintiffs are members of a society challenging the actions of the Managing Committee regarding membership eligibility. Defendants are accused of favoritism in admitting new members, leading to a legal dispute.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 136/2018
Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
Garden View Apartment owners Association filed a restoration petition after their suit was dismissed for default when they failed to appear for trial. The court considered the circumstances and allowed the restoration subject to a cost being paid.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 81/2024
Case between Jishnu P.M vs B.K Santha regarding Absence of Plaintiff
In the matter between Jishnu P.M and B.K Santha, the plaintiff was absent during the court hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1306/2022
Case between Mr. K.D. Josey et al vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction, mandatory injunction and other reliefs
Mr. K.D. Josey filed suit against The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam for various reliefs. The parties settled during a mediation and entered an agreement, leading to the court decreeing as per the settlement terms.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1305/2022
Case between Benoy K.A. vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction, mandatory injunction and other reliefs
Plaintiff Mr. Benoy K.A., aged 50, S/o. Antony, Kakramssery House, Manuel Lane, Thykoodam Desom, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District. Defendant The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam, represented by its Secretary, having office at Building No. 51/925, Church Road, Thykoodam, Vyttila, PIN-682019, Poonithura Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District. Suit decreed as per mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
O.S. No.1303/2022
Case between Mr Xavier V A et al vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding Declaration, Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, Mandatory Injunction
This is a suit for declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction, mandatory injunction, and other reliefs. The parties entered into a settlement during mediation, resulting in the revival of the plaintiff's membership with the defendant sangham.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1302/2022
Case between Mr. T.R. Sebastian vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding Declaration, Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, Mandatory Injunction and Other Reliefs
Plaintiff Mr. T.R. Sebastian sued defendant The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam for multiple reliefs. The court facilitated a mediation, resulting in a settlement agreement between the parties.
Civil Suit
O.S. No.1300/2022
Case between Mr. Peter K.A. @ Nelson et al vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding Declaration, Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, Mandatory Injunction and Other Reliefs
This case involves Mr. Peter K.A. @ Nelson and others as plaintiffs against The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam as the defendant. The plaintiffs sought declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction, mandatory injunction, and other reliefs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 789/2024
Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
The Union Bank of India filed a suit against Ms. Beena Joseph regarding a legal matter. The case was presented in court but was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
O.S No. 876/2023
Case between Mr. Irshad C.I vs Mrs. Indira Chacko et al regarding undisclosed matter
Involves Mr. Irshad C.I as plaintiff against Mrs. Indira Chacko and another as defendants. The case was dismissed due to absence of both parties.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
O.S No. 232/2019
Case between M/s Desai Homes et al vs M/s DD Misty Hills Apartment Owners Association et al regarding Civil Procedure
Case between M/s Desai Homes et al and M/s DD Misty Hills Apartment Owners Association et al. Suit and IA 8/2023 dismissed for not being pressed.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
O.S. No. 1432/2019
Case between Ashok R Nair et al vs Vinu Lal et al regarding Unspecified Matter
Case involves Ashok R Nair et al filing a suit under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure. The suit got dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 915/2016
Case between K P Antony et al vs Swarna Latha regarding Section 26 read with Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
Involves plaintiff K P Antony and Laly Antony vs defendant Swarna Latha over a civil suit. Issue No: 1 found in favour of plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 754/2022
Case between Union Bank of India, Panampilly Nagar (eCB) Branch vs Mathew T A et al regarding Default dismissal
Case involves a suit filed by Union Bank of India against Mathew T A et al under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff not interested to proceed with the suit, hence it was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.749/2013
Case between K.Rajkumar vs K.Rajalakshmi et al regarding declaration and injunction
Case involves K.Rajkumar claiming ownership of property with northern boundary wall and gate, facing opposition from K.Rajalakshmi and others. Dispute arose after defendants removed gate, leading to suit for prevention of unlawful demolition of wall.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 180/2023
Case between Shibu P.K vs Thomas Varghese et al regarding Civil Suit
In civil suit no. 180/2023, plaintiff Shibu P.K filed against defendants Thomas Varghese et al. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff failed to appear.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 74/2020
Case between Atom Marketing et al vs Mathew Joseph regarding Dismissal due to Plaintiff's absence
Plaintiff Atom Marketing represented by Laila Pareeth vs Defendant Mathew Joseph. Plaintiff absent, case dismissed with costs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won