Case Summary
Case involves a suit filed by Union Bank of India against Mathew T A et al under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff not interested to proceed with the suit, hence it was dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Suit dismissed for default as plaintiff showed no interest in proceeding.
Key Reasoning:
Not available
Not available
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank of India
- Relation
- Represented by its Branch Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mathew T A
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o T M Abraham
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kochuthresia Jency K V
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- W/o Mathew T A
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bobby John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Venkideswaran S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- N C Sajith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Bar Registration
- No Vakalath
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India, Panampilly Nagar (eCB) Branch vs Mathew T A et al regarding Default dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India, Panampilly Nagar (eCB) Branch vs Mathew T A et al regarding Default dismissal