Similar Cases
Based on: O.S No. 456/2023 — Case between Punnan Philip P et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O.S No. 9/2021
Case between Thankachan vs State of Kerala et al regarding a civil suit
Thankachan is the plaintiff in this case against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was not present or ready for ex parte evidence despite numerous opportunities.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 537/1970
Case between K.T. Vincent vs State of Kerala et al regarding police protection and delivery of property.
K.T. Vincent is the decree holder seeking police protection and aid for the removal of obstacles to deliver a property. The defendants include the State of Kerala and officials from the Schedule Caste Welfare Board.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 9 of 2021
Case between Thankachan vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal for default
Thankachan filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the case being dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 1417/2019
Case between M.L.Joseph vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal for default
M.L.Joseph is the plaintiff who filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other officials. The court dismissed the case for default as both parties were absent and no proof affidavit was filed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 886/2023
Case between John vs State of Kerala et al regarding withdrawal of lawsuit
The plaintiff, John, aged 66, brought the suit against the State of Kerala and two other defendants. The court allowed the plaintiff to withdraw the suit during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 4/2026
Case between Laya Antony vs State of Kerala et al regarding temporary injunction for participation in State School Kalolsavam
Laya Antony, a minor, represented by her mother, filed a petition for an interim injunction to allow her participation in the State School Kalolsavam after placing second in the District School Kalolsavam. The respondents are the State of Kerala and the Deputy Director of Education, who objected to the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 783/2020
Case between Joshy vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of title and injunction.
The plaintiff, Joshy, is seeking a declaration of title and an injunction against the defendants, including the State of Kerala and its officials, for alleged illegal eviction from his property. The case revolves around claims of continuous possession and the applicability of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 209/2019
Case between Sudhi vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Sudhi, the plaintiff, is seeking to establish his ownership and prevent the defendants from encroaching on his property. The defendants include various government officials who have allegedly threatened to demolish part of his property, claiming it is part of government land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 210/2019
Case between Nitha Shaji et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves plaintiffs Nitha Shaji, her minor children Meenakshi and Krishnananda, who claim ownership of a property in Nadama Village. They sought an injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with their possession of the property, which they allege is being wrongly claimed by the government.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.55/2014
Case between Danial Varghese et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of title and mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Danial Varghese and others, claim ownership of a property that has been wrongly classified as government land by the defendants, the State of Kerala and its officials. They seek a declaration of title and corrections in the revenue records.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 224/2022
Case between Sunil Kumar Narayanan et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sunil Kumar Narayanan and Manju Narayanan, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other authorities for a permanent prohibitory injunction. They contested the government's acquisition of their property without proper measurement and valuation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 624/2018
Case between A. Satheesh et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding a civil suit.
The plaintiffs, including A. Satheesh and others, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants regarding a legal matter. The suit was dismissed by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.753/2024
Case between Fathima Farhath vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
Fathima Farhath, through her mother Jamsheela, filed a suit against multiple defendants including the State of Kerala. The suit was not pressed and subsequently dismissed by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.797/2023
Case between Minhaj.M.K. et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
The plaintiffs, a group of minor students, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other education officials regarding their educational rights. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed following an endorsement by the plaintiff's counsel.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 640/2024
Case between Snigdha.K vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Snigdha.K, a minor represented by her mother, filed a suit against multiple defendants for a mandatory injunction. The case was about allowing the plaintiff to participate in the District Kalolsavam which has already taken place.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 636/2024
Case between Kavya Vinod vs State of Kerala et al regarding mandatory injunction to participate in District Kalolsavam.
Kavya Vinod, a minor represented by her father Vinod Kumar, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants to allow her participation in the District Kalolsavam. The case was dismissed as infructuous since the event had already occurred.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 749/2015
Case between Dakshayani, K.C. et al vs State of Kerala regarding reopening the evidence.
This case involves a petition filed by the plaintiffs seeking to reopen evidence. The State of Kerala is the defendant represented by the Secretary of the Revenue Department.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 324/2019
Case between Haris et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, who are children and the wife of late Shamsudeen, claim ownership of certain properties that their father had acquired. They filed this suit against the State of Kerala and its officials, contesting eviction notices served under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP. 90/2025 in OS. No. 586/2017
Case between Jamaludheen vs State of Kerala et al regarding restoration of suit
Jamaludheen filed a petition to restore a previously dismissed suit. The court allowed the petition after noting that the defendant did not file any objection.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 9/2026
Case between Sreelakshmi Babu vs State of Kerala et al regarding temporary injunction for participation in State School Kalolsavam
The petitioner, Sreelakshmi Babu, aged 18, sought a temporary injunction to participate in the State School Kalolsavam. She alleged that her lower placements in previous competitions were due to corruption in the organization of the events.
Injunction
Defendant Won
O.S No. 1056/2005
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
The plaintiffs, T.O Abraham and Binu Zacharia, were involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, T.O Aleyas and Binoj T. Baby. The matter was settled, and the court dismissed the case as the plaintiff was not present.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
O.S No. 997/2024
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
Plaintiffs include Ammini M.N, Indraja, and Neeraja represented by Ammini M.N, and Defendants include Sindhu, Max Life Insurance Company Ltd., Life Insurance Corporation of India, Royal Swayam Sahaya Sangham, Brothers Swayam Sahaya Sangham, and St. Joseph's Avashatha Nivarana Sangham.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 863/2014
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
Plaintiff Kunju Bava aged 53, S/o. Haidrose Kutti, and defendant C. A Abdulla aged 66, S/o. Abubacker, involved in a dispute over properties in Elamkulam village purchased in 1995. Plaintiff seeking specific performance of agreement dated 26.06.2011
Civil Suit
O.S No. 733/2014
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
In the matter of Nithya vs Babu et al, the plaintiff was not ready for evidence in the listed case, leading to dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 493/2012
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
Case between Prakash Pai, his family members versus Saju, his family members. Suit dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh suit.
Civil Suit
O.S No. 240/2014
Case between Newja N. Joy et al vs Mrs. Lilly et al regarding fixation of boundary, injunction and consequential reliefs
Case involves plaintiffs claiming ownership of property bought from defendants 1 to 3. Dispute arose due to trespassing and boundary issues. Plaintiffs seek to fix boundary and seek injunction against defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.539/2020
Case between M/s Kerala Gramin Bank, Cheranellore Branch, Cheranellore vs Manu Gopi et al regarding Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
Plaintiff is M/s Kerala Gramin Bank, Cheranellore Branch represented by Deepthi Prakash. Defendants are Manu Gopi et al. The suit was decreed based on the terms of a successful Mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.309/2021
Case between Sree Narayana Sevika Samajam et al vs Pulikkal Medical Foundation et al regarding Suit filed Under Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
In the matter of Sree Narayana Sevika Samajam vs Pulikkal Medical Foundation regarding a suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff was absent and had no representation. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff did not intend to proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.68/2024
Case between Reji Mathew et al vs Divya Deepak regarding Non-payment of Balance Court Fee
Case between Reji Mathew and others against Divya Deepak regarding non-payment of balance court fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 10/2008
Case between K.C.George et al vs. Divakaran et al regarding boundary fixation, possession recovery, and injunction
Plaintiffs include K.C.George et al, seeking boundary fixation, recovery of possession, and injunction against Divakaran et al.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 546/2018
Case between Yamuna Paul vs K.A Balan et al regarding Absence of Plaintiff
Plaintiff Yamuna Paul, W/o. Paul John, aged 45 years, failed to appear for the case. Judgment was given in favor of defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.245/2018
Case between P R Radhakrishnan et al vs Sree Narayana Dharma Samajam et al regarding declaration and injunction
Plaintiffs are members of a society challenging the actions of the Managing Committee regarding membership eligibility. Defendants are accused of favoritism in admitting new members, leading to a legal dispute.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 136/2018
Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
Garden View Apartment owners Association filed a restoration petition after their suit was dismissed for default when they failed to appear for trial. The court considered the circumstances and allowed the restoration subject to a cost being paid.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 81/2024
Case between Jishnu P.M vs B.K Santha regarding Absence of Plaintiff
In the matter between Jishnu P.M and B.K Santha, the plaintiff was absent during the court hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1306/2022
Case between Mr. K.D. Josey et al vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction, mandatory injunction and other reliefs
Mr. K.D. Josey filed suit against The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam for various reliefs. The parties settled during a mediation and entered an agreement, leading to the court decreeing as per the settlement terms.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1305/2022
Case between Benoy K.A. vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction, mandatory injunction and other reliefs
Plaintiff Mr. Benoy K.A., aged 50, S/o. Antony, Kakramssery House, Manuel Lane, Thykoodam Desom, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District. Defendant The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam, represented by its Secretary, having office at Building No. 51/925, Church Road, Thykoodam, Vyttila, PIN-682019, Poonithura Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District. Suit decreed as per mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
O.S. No.1303/2022
Case between Mr Xavier V A et al vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding Declaration, Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, Mandatory Injunction
This is a suit for declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction, mandatory injunction, and other reliefs. The parties entered into a settlement during mediation, resulting in the revival of the plaintiff's membership with the defendant sangham.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1302/2022
Case between Mr. T.R. Sebastian vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding Declaration, Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, Mandatory Injunction and Other Reliefs
Plaintiff Mr. T.R. Sebastian sued defendant The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam for multiple reliefs. The court facilitated a mediation, resulting in a settlement agreement between the parties.
Civil Suit
O.S. No.1300/2022
Case between Mr. Peter K.A. @ Nelson et al vs The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam regarding Declaration, Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, Mandatory Injunction and Other Reliefs
This case involves Mr. Peter K.A. @ Nelson and others as plaintiffs against The Thykoodam Edavaka Christeeya Sangam as the defendant. The plaintiffs sought declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction, mandatory injunction, and other reliefs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 789/2024
Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
The Union Bank of India filed a suit against Ms. Beena Joseph regarding a legal matter. The case was presented in court but was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
O.S No. 876/2023
Case between Mr. Irshad C.I vs Mrs. Indira Chacko et al regarding undisclosed matter
Involves Mr. Irshad C.I as plaintiff against Mrs. Indira Chacko and another as defendants. The case was dismissed due to absence of both parties.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
O.S No. 232/2019
Case between M/s Desai Homes et al vs M/s DD Misty Hills Apartment Owners Association et al regarding Civil Procedure
Case between M/s Desai Homes et al and M/s DD Misty Hills Apartment Owners Association et al. Suit and IA 8/2023 dismissed for not being pressed.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
O.S. No. 1432/2019
Case between Ashok R Nair et al vs Vinu Lal et al regarding Unspecified Matter
Case involves Ashok R Nair et al filing a suit under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure. The suit got dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 915/2016
Case between K P Antony et al vs Swarna Latha regarding Section 26 read with Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
Involves plaintiff K P Antony and Laly Antony vs defendant Swarna Latha over a civil suit. Issue No: 1 found in favour of plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 754/2022
Case between Union Bank of India, Panampilly Nagar (eCB) Branch vs Mathew T A et al regarding Default dismissal
Case involves a suit filed by Union Bank of India against Mathew T A et al under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff not interested to proceed with the suit, hence it was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.749/2013
Case between K.Rajkumar vs K.Rajalakshmi et al regarding declaration and injunction
Case involves K.Rajkumar claiming ownership of property with northern boundary wall and gate, facing opposition from K.Rajalakshmi and others. Dispute arose after defendants removed gate, leading to suit for prevention of unlawful demolition of wall.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 180/2023
Case between Shibu P.K vs Thomas Varghese et al regarding Civil Suit
In civil suit no. 180/2023, plaintiff Shibu P.K filed against defendants Thomas Varghese et al. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff failed to appear.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 74/2020
Case between Atom Marketing et al vs Mathew Joseph regarding Dismissal due to Plaintiff's absence
Plaintiff Atom Marketing represented by Laila Pareeth vs Defendant Mathew Joseph. Plaintiff absent, case dismissed with costs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won