Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1417/2019

Case between M.L.Joseph vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-01-11
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M.L.Joseph is the plaintiff who filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other officials. The court dismissed the case for default as both parties were absent and no proof affidavit was filed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case as both the plaintiff and defendants were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

The court on the same day delivered the following: JUDGMENT Plaintiff absent, represented. Defendant absent, no representation. No proof affidavit filed. Dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M.L.Joseph (71 years years) Madathilparambil, Edayakunnam, Valam South Chittoor P.O, Ernakulam District, pin – 682 027

Defendants

State of Kerala (Age not specified years) Collectorate, Kakkanad, Ernkulam, Pin – 682 030 The District Collector (Age not specified years) Collectorate, Kakkanad, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 030 The Tahsildar (L.R) (Age not specified years) Kanayannur Taluk, Taluk Office, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 011 The Village Officer (Age not specified years) Cheranelloor village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam, Pin – 683 544

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

State of Kerala

Similar Cases