Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Punnan Philip P and Denny Philip, are seeking a decree for the fixation of boundaries and a permanent injunction against the defendants, which include the State of Kerala and various government officials. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and the legality of certain land surveys.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to non-joinder of necessary parties and because the plaintiffs had pending appeals regarding the same matter.
The suit was dismissed due to non-joinder of necessary parties and because the plaintiffs had pending appeals regarding the same matter.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Issue Numbers I, III and IV are answered as against the plaintiffs. In view of the discussions and findings as regards Issue Numbers I, III and IV, the suit is to be dismissed and is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Punnan Philip P (46 years)
32/2324 Pushpamangalam, Civil Lane Road, Palarivattom P.O, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam. Pin code - 682 019.
Denny Philip P (57 years)
House No.29/17A, Pushpamangalam House, 2nd Lane, TOC-H School Road, Poonithura Village, Emakulam, Pin code - 682 019.
Defendants
State of Kerala represented by its Secretary to the Government (Age not specified years)
Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram, Pin code - 695 001.
The District Collector, Ernakulam (Age not specified years)
Collectorate, Kakkanad, Ernakulam, Pin code - 682 030.
The Superintendent of Survey and Land Records (Age not specified years)
Re-Survey Superintendent Office, Mini Civil Station, Piravam Road, Ernakulam, Pin code - 686 664.
The Tahsildar, Kanayannur Taluk Office (Age not specified years)
Ernakulam, Pin code - 682 011.
The Village Officer, Edappally North Village Office (Age not specified years)
Ponekkara Road, Ponekkara, Ernakulam, Pin code - 682 024.
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
Hence Issues III and IV are to be answered as against the plaintiffs and are answered so.