Similar Cases
Based on: Restor.Pt 1555/2014 — Case between Pathiyil Jameela vs Pothanchery Saidali regarding undisclosed matter
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Restor.Pt 1965/2013
Case between Thadathil Ismalu vs Aboobacker et al regarding petition allowed with cost deposit
Petitioner Thadathil Ismalu filed a petition against multiple respondents which was allowed conditionally on depositing a cost of Rs.4000 by a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2477/2012
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Petitioner Mullanmadakkal Mammi filed a petition on medical grounds, which was allowed with the condition of paying costs of Rs. 1000.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
FDA/1251/2016
Case between Anitha. T.R. vs Sasi regarding formal counter
Petitioner Anitha. T.R. filed a case against respondent Sasi, and the court allowed the petition on payment of costs of Rs. 2,000.
Civil Suit - Not clearly mentioned
Plaintiff Won
Restor.] 2406/2014
Case between Muhammed et al vs Hamza et al regarding unknown matter
Petition filed by multiple petitioners against respondents, where the petition was dismissed for non-payment of costs.
Not mentioned
Defendant Won
Restor.P 1912/2016
Case between Kunhimoideenkutty vs Beeran haji regarding unknown matter
A case filed by Kunhimoideenkutty against Beeran haji was dismissed with no costs.
Not mentioned
Dismissed
Restor. 768/2017
Case between C.Abdul salam vs Kunheen regarding counter filing
Petitioner C.Abdul salam, represented by agent Muhammad Shafi, filed a case seeking permission for counter filing with the court.
Not mentioned
Plaintiff Won
EP 37/2017
Case between Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Kovayil Chandran regarding EP 37/2017
The case involves a dispute between Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd and Kovayil Chandran resulting in EP 37/2017 being dismissed for fault due to non-payment of batta.
Not mentioned
Defendant Won
Restor.P 2833/2017
Case between Jaisal vs Accomplishing Marketing Company regarding Not mentioned
Petition filed by Jaisal against Accomplishing Marketing Company, allowed by the court.
Not mentioned
Plaintiff Won
EP 438/2012
Case between Kothatt Abdulla vs Vijayakumari et al regarding default judgment
Kothatt Abdulla as the decree holder filed a petition against Vijayakumari and others seeking execution of a decree, but the petition was dismissed for default.
Execution Proceeding
Defendant Won
EP 12/2014
Case between Fathima vs Pathummu et al regarding execution petition
Decree holder Fathima filed an execution petition against Pathummu and others in the Court of Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram.
Execution Petition
Restor.Ptn 836/2014
Case between Hamza vs Rukhiya regarding restoration petition
A case involving a restoration petition filed by Hamza against Rukhiya where the petitioner was allowed to proceed after paying a cost to the respondent.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
EP 204/2013
Case between Kizhakkevalappil Pathumma et al vs Aoobacker et al regarding property delivery
Decree holder filed a case against judgment debtors for property delivery, which was successfully delivered and recorded by the court.
Civil Execution Proceedings
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 244 of 2015
Case between Thankamani vs Muhammedali et al regarding injunction
Plaintiff Thankamani filed suit against defendants Muhammedali, Ayisha, and Sivadasan seeking injunction.
Civil Suit - Injunction
Original Suit No. 257 of 2016
Case between Naseera et al vs Noushad Babu et al regarding injunction
Plaintiffs filed a suit seeking injunction against defendants, but the suit was not pressed and subsequently dismissed.
Civil Suit - Injunction
Defendant Won
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 74 OF 2016
Case between Hallalath et al vs Muhammed Shefeekh et al regarding eviction for arrears of rent
The petitioners seek eviction of the respondents from a shop room due to arrears of rent and bonafide need to start their own business.
Eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent) Control Act
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 116 OF 2017
Case between Vadakkekalathil Parameswaran vs Kooriparambil Moideen Haji et al regarding injunction
Plaintiff Vadakkekalathil Parameswaran filed a suit for injunction against defendants Kooriparambil Moideen Haji and Basheer. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit - Injunction
Defendant Won
EP 424/2012
Case between Canara Bank vs P. Muraleedharan et al regarding transfer certificate
Canara Bank filed a case against P. Muraleedharan and Raghunandanan.M.V. seeking a transfer certificate.
Not mentioned
EP 62/2013
Case between Secretary vs Ahammedkutty Poozhithara regarding default judgement
The Secretary of Perumanna Klari Service Co-op.Bank filed a petition against Ahammedkutty Poozhithara seeking a decree which was dismissed due to default.
Not mentioned
Defendant Won
EP 152/2013
Case between South Malabar Gramin Bank vs M.Koya regarding loan repayment
South Malabar Gramin Bank filed a petition against M.Koya for loan repayment, which was later dismissed as not pressed.
Not mentioned
Dismissed
Original Suit No. 155/12 W OF 2014
Case between Kunhali vs Shaji Mon regarding undisclosed matter
Kunhali, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Shaji Mon, the defendant, which was later dismissed without costs as the suit was not pressed.
Not mentioned
Defendant Won
Restor. 35/2014
Case between Thazhatheveettil Rajesh vs Paravannangadi Sreenivasan regarding Not mentioned
Petitioner Thazhatheveettil Rajesh, represented by Power of Attorney holder, filed a petition against respondent Paravannangadi Sreenivasan. The court allowed the petition.
Not mentioned
Plaintiff Won
ST/69/2015
Case between ICICI Bank Ltd. vs K.Jolly Thomas regarding disagreement settlement in Lok Adalath
ICICI Bank Ltd. filed a case against K.Jolly Thomas, the owner of Kakkessery Autos, which was settled in Lok Adalath with both sides agreeing to close the proceedings based on the award passed.
Not mentioned
Partial
ST/75/2015
Case between Enikutty vs Beerankutty regarding settlement in Lok Adalath
Petitioner Enikutty filed a case against respondent Beerankutty, which was settled between the parties in Lok Adalath resulting in the closure of proceedings.
Not mentioned
Partial
Restor.P 1246/2015
Case between Manakkattthodi Entheenkutty vs Manakkatt Thodi Muhammed Safal regarding cost payment
A petition filed by Manakkattthodi Entheenkutty against Manakkatt Thodi Muhammed Safal got dismissed for non-payment of cost.
Not mentioned
Defendant Won
FDA 1105/2015
Case between Meleppurath Illathayil Hameed vs Pathumma et al regarding preliminary decree
Petitioner filed a petition to set aside a preliminary decree, which has now been closed by the court.
Not mentioned
Plaintiff Won
FDA3521/2015
Case between Naseera Rahman et al vs Sunil Ahammed regarding final decree
Petitioner Naseera Rahman and Babitha filed a case against respondent Sunil Ahammed resulting in the final decree passed.
Not mentioned
Plaintiff Won
EP 76/2015
Case between Mannuparambil Abootty haji vs Vengali parambil Raman regarding matter settlement
The case involved a matter settlement before adalath resulting in full satisfaction recorded and EP closed.
Not mentioned
EP 7/2017
Case between Moideen vs Absdurahman regarding settled matter
Moideen filed a petition against Absdurahman which was almost settled between the parties resulting in the case being closed temporarily.
Not mentioned
ST 8/2016
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs Ummer.K.P. regarding settlement in Adalath
A case where Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd. filed a petition against Ummer.K.P. However, the matter was settled in the Lok Adalath with full payment made.
Not mentioned
Plaintiff Won
ST/10/2017
Case between Sakkeena vs Soudha regarding settlement in Adalath
Petitioner Sakkeena filed a case against Respondent Soudha which was settled in Adalath with an award passed.
Not mentioned
Restor.] 174/2018
Case between Ali vs P.K. Muhammad and Edachalam Salafi Masjid Committiee regarding undisclosed matter
Ali filed a case against P.K. Muhammad and Edachalam Salafi Masjid Committiee, which was allowed by the court on payment of a cost of Rs. 1500.
Not mentioned
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 280/2014
Case between Muhammedunni vs Madhavan et al regarding petition allowance
Muhammedunni filed a petition seeking allowance which was granted with a condition to pay costs of s.4000 on or before 07-07-2014 to the respondents.
Civil Suit - Petition Allowance
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 1552/2014
Case between Ali Akbar vs Parakkundil Mumthaz regarding Unknown
Petitioner Ali Akbar filed a petition, allowed on the condition to pay costs to respondent Parakkundil Mumthaz.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 2285/2014
Case between Shanmughan alias Aramughan vs Yahutty regarding petition alllowed on payment of costs
Petitioner Shanmughan alias Aramughan filed a petition which was allowed on the condition of paying costs to the respondent Yahutty.
Civil Case - Petition
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 2499/2014
Case between Avarankal Raheem vs Government of Kerala et al regarding petition
Petition allowed with condition to pay cost to respondent.
Civil Petition
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 165/2014
Case between Chakkanaparambil Kader vs Pallathara Valappil Ravunni regarding unknown
Petitioner Chakkanaparambil Kader filed a petition against respondent Pallathara Valappil Ravunni, which was allowed on the condition to pay costs of RS4000 to the respondent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 122/2015
Case between Abdurahiman Haji vs Ubaid regarding Unpaid Costs
Abdurahiman Haji filed a petition against Ubaid requesting costs. The court dismissed the petition due to non-payment of costs.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
Restor.Pt 1587/2015
Case between Rukhiya vs Peringottukara Namboodiri Yogakshema Sabha et al regarding Set Aside Decree
The petitioner Rukhiya challenged a decree dated 5-6-2015, which was set aside, and the case listed for trial.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 3003/2015
Case between Khadeeja vs Kallumottakkal Alavi regarding petition allowance subject to payment of costs
Khadeeja filed a petition against Kallumottakkal Alavi, which was allowed on the condition of paying costs to the respondent by a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 503/2016
Case between Maniparambil Sarada vs State of Kerala et al regarding petition dismissal
Petitioner Sarada filed a petition against State of Kerala and others. The petition was allowed on the condition of paying costs, which were not paid, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
Restor.Pt 1770/2016
Case between Habeebur Rahman vs Padinhare Vakayil Abdul Gafur regarding Unknown
Habeebur Rahman filed a case against Padinhare Vakayil Abdul Gafur. No counter seen filed, and hence the case was allowed.
Civil Suit - Not Counter Seen
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 621/2017
Case between Rahmathulla By Mukthiyar Agent Abdul Asees vs Medammal Razak Haji regarding medical petition
Petitioner Rahmathulla sought relief on medical grounds to contest the matter which was allowed by the court on payment of a cost of Rs.2500.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ST No.3278/2023
Case between Gentleman Chitts Funds Co India Pvt Ltd H.O et al vs Sivadasan P.K. regarding trial and disposal.
Gentleman Chitts Funds Co India Pvt Ltd H.O is the petitioner represented by Sareeshmon C S. The respondent is Sivadasan P.K., and the case concerns a trial and disposal order made over to the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court II, Vaikom.
Not mentioned
IA. 3/ 2023
Case between Antony Fernandez et al vs Bobulal et al regarding Petition for default dismissal
The petition involves Antony Fernandez and Fini Francis as petitioners and Bobulal and Simon Francis as respondents. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioner and no representation.
Not mentioned
Defendant Won
RP. 106/ 2023
Case between Scholastica Netto et al vs Ciril et al regarding petition dismissal for default.
The petitioners are Scholastica Netto and Sheena B, while the respondents include Ciril, Shihin, Sheela, Sajo B. Netto, and Joseph. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioner and lack of representation.
Not mentioned
Defendant Won
RP. 141/ 2024
Case between N. Siva Prasad et al vs Ajithkumar regarding delay con donation
The petitioner, N. Siva Prasad, represented by Mulamkadakam Devi Kshethra Trust, is seeking a con donation of delay in a petition. The respondent is Ajithkumar.
Not mentioned
Plaintiff Won
RP 2634/2012
Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Petitioner Hamza filed a petition seeking a favorable decision, which was allowed on the condition of paying a cost of RS.1000, later paid.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2705/2012
Case between Nadambadi Santhakumari vs Secretary regarding unspecified matter
Nadambadi Santhakumari filed a case against the Secretary, and the court allowed the case on the condition of paying a cost of Rs.1000.
Civil Dispute
Plaintiff Won