Restor.Pt 1965/2013

Case between Thadathil Ismalu vs Aboobacker et al regarding petition allowed with cost deposit

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Sri. Sanu C, B.sc, LLM
Order Date
2014-02-24
Duration
0 years, 4 months, 5 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Thadathil Ismalu filed a petition against multiple respondents which was allowed conditionally on depositing a cost of Rs.4000 by a specified date.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed with a condition to deposit a cost of Rs.4000 before a specified date.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition allowed with conditional cost deposit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Petition is allowed on condition to deposit cost of Rs.4000/- on or before 24-2-2014. Cost deposited IA allowed

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Thadathil Ismalu (0 years) Ponmundam Amsom, Adrussery Desom

Defendants

Aboobacker (0 years) Ponmundam Amsom, Adrussery Desom Appu alias Velayudha (0 years) Ponmundam Amsom, Adrussery Desom Kannan (0 years) Ponmundam Amsom, Adrussery Desom Sankaran (0 years) Ponmundam Amsom, Adrussery Desom Kunhimuhammed Haji (0 years) Ponmundam Amsom, Adrussery Desom Kunhimuhammed (0 years) Ponmundam Amsom, Adrussery deso

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Unknown
Description:
Petition allowed with conditional cost deposit
Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to deposit cost of Rs.4000/- on or before 24-2-2014. Cost deposited IA allowed

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Tue, 10/29/2013 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Not mentioned

Similar Cases