Case Summary
Petitioner Thadathil Ismalu filed a petition against multiple respondents which was allowed conditionally on depositing a cost of Rs.4000 by a specified date.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition allowed with conditional cost deposit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed with a condition to deposit a cost of Rs.4000 before a specified date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to deposit cost of Rs.4000/- on or before 24-2-2014. Cost deposited IA allowed
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thadathil Ismalu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aboobacker
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Appu alias Velayudha
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kannan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sankaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhimuhammed Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhimuhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Not mentioned
- Appearance Type
- Not mentioned
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Unknown
Description:
Petition allowed with conditional cost deposit
Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to deposit cost of Rs.4000/- on or before 24-2-2014. Cost deposited IA allowed
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PT
Case Code Year
2013