Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restor. 768/2017

Case between C.Abdul salam vs Kunheen regarding counter filing

Court
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Sanu C, B.sc, LLM
Order Date
2017-07-28
Duration
0 years, 4 months, 12 days
Case Code No.
768
Case Closed
Fri, 07/28/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner C.Abdul salam, represented by agent Muhammad Shafi, filed a case seeking permission for counter filing with the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petitioner's application for counter filing upon payment of costs of Rs. 2500.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permission to file counter
Case Type
Not mentioned
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitioner's application for counter filing upon payment of costs of Rs. 2500.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Counter filed. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that he has only a formal counter. It can be allowed on terms. Hence IA stands allowed on payment of costs of Rs.2500/- for giving an opportunity to take up the matter. For payment of costs. IA 767/16- Heard. Counsel for the respondent submitted that may have only a formal counter. And it can be allowed on terms. Hence the application stands allowed on payment of cost of Rs.2500/- for payment of costs

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C.Abdul salam
Party Age
44
Relation
Represented by Mukthiyar Agent Muhammad Shafi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunheen
Party Age
53
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
GOPIKADAVATH
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for Kunheen
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permission for counter filing
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission for petitioner to file a counter as requested
Evidence:
The court allowed the petitioner's application for counter filing upon payment of costs of Rs. 2500.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Not mentioned
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 03/17/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 07/28/2017 - 12:00
From
Sat, 07/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/14/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Pathiyil Jameela vs Pothanchery Saidali regarding undisclosed matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Not mentioned Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammed et al vs Hamza et al regarding unknown matter
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Not mentioned Defendant Won
Case between Kunhimoideenkutty vs Beeran haji regarding unknown matter
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Not mentioned Dismissed
Case between Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Kovayil Chandran regarding EP 37/2017
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Not mentioned Defendant Won
Case between Jaisal vs Accomplishing Marketing Company regarding Not mentioned
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Not mentioned Plaintiff Won