| Niyamam AI

Displaying 321 - 325 of 21809

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Suprabha et al vs Tinu Prakash et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 502/2021

Kollam

2025-07-31

approximately-4 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bharathan et al vs Satheesan et al regarding Declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.559/2021

Kollam

2025-07-31

approximately-5 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Tossy Cyril et al regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 556/2019

Kollam

2025-08-01

approximately-6 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Canara Bank vs Shajana.S. et al regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 271/2024

Kollam

2025-07-31

approximately-10 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sarala et al regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 169/2025

Kollam

2025-08-05

approximately-3 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence

Insufficient evidence provided by plaintiffs resulted in dismissals for lack of proof regarding means or claims.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Defendants often did not take necessary procedural steps, leading to their cases being dismissed for default.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many dismissals occurred due to the petitioner's absence from court hearings, impacting their claims adversely.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?