| Niyamam AI

Displaying 316 - 320 of 21806

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kamalamma et al vs Sreejan et al regarding injunction and temple administration

Injunction

OS.No. 279/2025

Kollam

2025-07-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Natarajan et al vs Sathyan et al regarding Declaration, Fixation of Boundary and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.621/2020

Kollam

2025-07-31

approximately-5 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between John Fernandez et al vs Navas regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 645/2017

Kollam

2025-07-31

approximately-7 years 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Haris et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 324/2019

Kollam

2025-07-31

approximately-6 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Suprabha et al vs Tinu Prakash et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 502/2021

Kollam

2025-07-31

approximately-4 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9602

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide adequate evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take required procedural steps, such as issuing notices to respondents.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Some petitions were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during court proceedings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Non-Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?