| Niyamam AI

Displaying 296 - 300 of 21805

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Akash S et al vs Anandavally regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 826/2023

Kollam

2025-07-21

approximately-2 years 1 month

Partial

View Full Details

Case between Patric Martin et al vs Daniel Joseph et al regarding execution application

Execution Application

OS.No. 530/2001

Kollam

2025-07-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sasikumar vs Ushadevarajan, Thankamani Vijayan regarding permanent prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 284/2023

Kollam

2025-07-21

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Soudamini et al vs Rejimon et al regarding temporary injunction.

Civil Suit

OS 626/2024

KOLLAM

2025-07-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Dileep Kumar vs Pushpakumar regarding Partition and Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 939/2016

Kollam

2025-07-21

approximately-9 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9602

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed due to non-payment of batta, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs frequently could not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Many plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

The non-appearance of petitioners in court contributed to numerous dismissals of their petitions.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?