| Niyamam AI

Displaying 20416 - 20420 of 21886

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Snigdha Sreenivas vs The General Convener, Programme committee et al regarding injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 28 OF 2017

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-23

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Kareem vs Saidalavi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 170 OF 2015

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-23

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kottepadam Chits Pvt.Ltd. vs Rajani regarding offence under N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:27/2016

Tirur

2017-02-23

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Nisar vs Thamikutty regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition 1462/2016

Malappuram

2017-02-22

0 years, 7 months, 2 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Zeenath Saries and Fashions Pvt. Ltd. vs Abdul Rasheed et al regarding injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 63 OF 2017

2017-02-22

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9642

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to pay the required court fees, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove means of repayment.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices or appearing in court.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs at scheduled hearings.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of Plaintiffs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?