Case Summary
The case involves Abdul Kareem as the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Saidalavi and Valappil Khadeeja. The parties reached a compromise, leading to the suit being decreed as per the terms of the agreement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed based on the terms of the compromise reached between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise were lawful.
The terms of the compromise were lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The terms of the compromise were lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Since the terms of the compromise is lawful suit is decreed as per the terms of compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Kareem
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saidalavi
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Valappil Khadeeja
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.P. Hussain
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.P. Shereef
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.A. Mamu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per the terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Since the terms of the compromise is lawful suit is decreed as per the terms of compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Kareem vs Saidalavi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Kareem vs Saidalavi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement