Case Summary
Nisar filed a restoration petition against Thamikutty. The court decided to dismiss the IA due to non-payment of costs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the IA as the costs were not paid.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The application stands allowed on payment of Rs. 4000/- and for payment. Costs not paid in IA1961/16. Hence that IA dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nisar
- Party Age
- 1
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thamikutty
- Party Age
- 1
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- I.P.Shajith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The application stands allowed on payment of Rs. 4000/-.
Evidence:
The application stands allowed on payment of Rs. 4000/- and for payment.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Costs not paid in IA1961/16.
Evidence:
Costs not paid in IA1961/16. Hence that IA dismissed.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
IA1461/2016 - Cost not paid.
Evidence:
Hence IA dismissed. IA1461/2016- Cost not paid.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nisar vs Thamikutty regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Nisar vs Thamikutty regarding restoration petition