| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17071 - 17075 of 22144

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Rev. Fr. Varghese Manavalan et al vs Sibichan Sebastian et al regarding impleadment of additional defendants.

O.S. No. 1235/2024

Ernakulam

2024-12-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Crystal Travel and Tours et al vs Brane Enterprises Ltd. et al regarding dismissal for default.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1329/2024

Ernakulam

2025-08-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between C A. Sudhakaran vs Aykkannandha Pradarssini Sabha et al regarding decree enforcement

Civil Suit

O.S No. 775/2011

Ernakulam District

2025-08-20

approximately-14 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mary Raju vs Sabeena regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 30/2025

Ernakulam

2025-08-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Sacramento Ventures vs Peters Kudumbilan regarding settlement in mediation.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 94/2025

Ernakulam

2025-08-19

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9766

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to pay the required batta for proceedings.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often failed to present necessary evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Numerous cases were dismissed because the petitioner did not appear in court during proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Dismissing petitions occurred when plaintiffs neglected to take steps to issue necessary notices to defendants.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of Petitioner

Failure to Issue Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?