Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 30/2025

Case between Mary Raju vs Sabeena regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-08-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mary Raju filed a rent control petition against Sabeena. The petition was not pressed as the respondent vacated the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed since the respondent vacated the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mary Raju (56 years years) Namboottil House, Kumbalam P.O., 682 506

Defendants

Sabeena (43 years years) Veliparambu House, Nettoor P.O., 682 040

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Petitioner submits rent control petition not pressed. Filed a memo to that effect stating respondent vacated petition scheduled property.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases