Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No.157/2023

Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-02-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Dr. M.N Subramanian and Mrs. K.M Saraswathy, filed a rent control petition against M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd and others for non-compliance with payment of rent arrears. The court found that the respondents failed to comply with the order to deposit the rent, leading to adverse actions against them.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the respondents to vacate the premises due to failure to comply with the payment orders. Consequently, all proceedings in the rent control petition were halted.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondents to vacate the premises due to failure to comply with the payment orders. Consequently, all proceedings in the rent control petition were halted.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondents failed to comply with the court's order regarding rent payment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondents failed to comply with the court's order regarding rent payment.
Supporting Evidence
The full bench of the Hon'ble High court held that consequence provided under Section 12(3) follows when there occurs a default in complying the direction for deposit or payment of admitted arrears.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. M.N Subramanian
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mrs. K.M Saraswathy
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ms. Hyeonju Park
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Jongman Park
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs. Deepa Aruja
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit of non-compliance, previous court orders
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Philip T. Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thomas T. Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shubha Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nitya R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Urmila M.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thahseem. A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vishnu Satheesan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kallyani G. Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amala Purushothaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gayathi Vijayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rineesha Rajkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.B. Thankappan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.T. Harikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This order relates to the compliance of payment of admitted arrears by the respondent.
Reference:
IA 3/2023

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. Renji Cherian et al vs Mr. Mohammed Saheer Sirajudeen et al regarding eviction from rented property.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Keecheri Sree Rama Varma Kerala Pattarya Samajam vs P.U. Rameshan regarding rent control compliance
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Hameed et al vs Shamsudheen et al regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown