Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No.36/2024

Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-02-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P.B Gopalakrishnan filed a rent control petition against Ms. Dilshana Siyad for compliance with rent payment orders. The court noted the respondent's failure to comply with the previous orders.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in possession of the property within 30 days due to non-compliance with previous orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ordered respondent to vacate the premises
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in possession of the property within 30 days due to non-compliance with previous orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the rent payment orders and did not show sufficient cause for the default.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the rent payment orders and did not show sufficient cause for the default.
Supporting Evidence
In the instant case, more than one month has elapsed after the order has been passed. So far respondent did not complied or show cause. Hence I am of the view that, the respondent having failed to comply with the order in IA 02/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears in liable to suffer consequence under Section 12(3) of the Act.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession the building within 30 days.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.B Gopalakrishnan
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ms. Dilshana Siyad
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renjith B. Marar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lakshmi N.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kaimal Rajkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Keshavraj Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arun Poomulli
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Preetha S. Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anand Remesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abijith Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abhiram S. Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rekha C.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gadha Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Viswanath Jayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Balasubramaniam R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anupriya S. Raju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nidhin Raj Vettikadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anjala Nazrin Subair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anjo Francis
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building within 30 days.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession the building within 30 days.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Rhine Biogenics (P) Ltd vs Century Associates regarding eviction and rent arrears
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.R. Babu vs Reethamma Lonappan et al regarding eviction under Section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kandathil Mathew Oommen vs Eljove C. Chummar regarding compliance with rent arrears.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr. Renji Cherian et al vs Mr. Mohammed Saheer Sirajudeen et al regarding eviction from rented property.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won