Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1329/2024

Case between Crystal Travel and Tours et al vs Brane Enterprises Ltd. et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Crystal Travel and Tours, represented by its partners, are against Brane Enterprises Ltd. and others. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' continuous absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and failure to remit balance court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and failure to remit balance court fees.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs were absent and did not represent themselves in court.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs were absent and did not represent themselves in court.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. Not represented. Balance Court Fee also not seen remitted. Several chances granted already. Plaintiff also absent continuously.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Crystal Travel and Tours
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shijith M.S
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Tijo Davis
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bins Michael
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Brane Enterprises Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anand Penmetcha
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bhavani Shanker
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Babu Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jimmy George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Crystal Travel and Tours et al vs Brane Enterprises Ltd. et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Crystal Travel and Tours et al vs Brane Enterprises Ltd. et al regarding dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won