| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17076 - 17080 of 22144

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between State Bank of India, RACPC- II, Ernakulam represented by its Manager (SARC), Frederic Jose vs Jibin Jude, Jude O A regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 878 / 2024

Ernakulam

2025-08-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Reji Joffy vs Sunil Krishnan regarding rent compliance

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 15/2024

Ernakulam

2025-08-11

approximately-1 year 28 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Chinnamma Thampi et al vs Kurian T C et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 330 /2023

Ernakulam

2025-10-30

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Babu Thomas et al regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 973/2022

Ernakulam

2025-08-22

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Antony Maliyekkal vs Joshy et al regarding civil procedure transfer

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1136/2023

Ernakulam

2025-08-21

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9766

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to pay the required batta for proceedings.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often failed to present necessary evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Numerous cases were dismissed because the petitioner did not appear in court during proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Dismissing petitions occurred when plaintiffs neglected to take steps to issue necessary notices to defendants.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of Petitioner

Failure to Issue Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?