| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 8376 - 8380 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between The secretary, Perumanna Klari Service Co-operative bank Ltd vs Prabhakaran et al regarding execution petition

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 13 of 2016

Tirur

2016-08-19

Less than a month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary, Perumanna Klari Service Co-operative bank Ltd et al vs Noushad et al regarding execution of decree

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 15 of 2016

Tirur

2016-08-19

Not mentioned

Petitioner

View Full Details

Case between SML Finance Limited vs Siraj et al regarding loan default

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

Original Suit No. 36 of 2016

Tirur

2016-08-12

Unknown

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pathakkutty Hajjumma vs Muhammed Sadikh regarding mandatory injunction and eviction

Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction and Eviction

Original Suit No. 189 OF 2015

Tirur

2016-08-12

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ummer Farooq vs Muhammed Kutty Haji et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

Original Suit No. 233 OF 2016

Tirur

2016-08-12

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs were unable to present necessary evidence to support their claims.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take required actions, such as issuing notices or responding to motions.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitioners' absence in court led to numerous case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?