Case Summary
Plaintiff Ummer Farooq filed suit seeking injunction against defendants which was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Plaintiff's suit for injunction was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff filed statement not pressing the plaint. Hence plaint is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ummer Farooq
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o Saidalikkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Kutty Haji
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o Beeran Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulaikha
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o Munammedkutty Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Not Pressing statement
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff's request for an injunction was not decided due to not pressing the plaint.
Evidence:
Plaintiff filed statement not pressing the plaint. Hence plaint is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ummer Farooq vs Muhammed Kutty Haji et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ummer Farooq vs Muhammed Kutty Haji et al regarding injunction