Original Suit No. 36 of 2016

Case between SML Finance Limited vs Siraj et al regarding loan default

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. Vincy.T.V.

Order Date

2016-08-12

Duration

Unknown

Case Closed

Fri, 08/12/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

SML Finance Limited sued Siraj and Haseena Mariyam for defaulting on a hire purchase loan for a motorcycle, seeking repayment of outstanding installments.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, SML Finance Limited, ordering the defendants to pay Rs. 64,362 with 6% interest from the date of the suit.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Repayment of loan amount with interest

Case Type

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

Final Judgment

The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, SML Finance Limited, ordering the defendants to pay Rs. 64,362 with 6% interest from the date of the suit.

Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff proved its case through reliable evidence showcasing the default in loan repayment by the defendants.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff proved its case through reliable evidence showcasing the default in loan repayment by the defendants.

Supporting Evidence

PW1 filed affidavit reiterating the averments in the plaint. Since the defendants remained exparte, the evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaintiff has proved its case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence, and the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree as prayed for.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: SML Finance Limited

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Siraj
Party Age: 39
Relation: S/o Abdul Khader

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Haseena Mariyam
Party Age: 32
Relation: W/o Siraj

Plaintiffs Documents

Loan documents, Hire Purchase Agreement (Ext.A1)

Defendants Documents

Not available

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money Recovery

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Repayment of loan amount with 6% interest

Evidence:

The plaintiff has proved its case by adducing reliable evidence.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Hire Purchase Agreement

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

The agreement executed by the defendants marked in favor of the plaintiff.

Reference:

Ext.A1

Case Classification