Case Summary
Palliyalil Nafeesa filed a summary suit against Alukkal Yahutty for the recovery of money. The defendant did not appear in response to the summons, leading to an ex-parte judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Dismissal for default
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff as the defendant failed to appear and defend the case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff adduced sufficient evidence, and the defendant failed to appear and defend the case.
Plaintiff adduced sufficient evidence, and the defendant failed to appear and defend the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the documents produced in support of the claim, I do not find any reason to disbelieve case of the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is decreed Ex-parte
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Palliyalil Nafeesa
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Alukkal Yahutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Examination-in-chief, documents at ExhA, ExhB, ExhC
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.V.Bindu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Alukkal Yahutty-R1
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Money Recovery
Outcome:
Dismissed for Default
Description:
Summary Suit for recovery of Money
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Money Recovery
Case Code
FDA
Case Code Year
2014