Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 189 OF 2015

Case between Pathakkutty Hajjumma vs Muhammed Sadikh regarding mandatory injunction and eviction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.B.A
Order Date
2016-08-12
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Fri, 08/12/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Pathakkutty Hajjumma, plaintiff, filed suit against Muhammed Sadikh, defendant, for a mandatory injunction and eviction, which was settled in Adalath with an award passed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The matter was settled in Adalath, and an award was passed. Consequently, the proceedings were closed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory injunction and eviction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction and Eviction
Final Judgment
No
The matter was settled in Adalath, and an award was passed. Consequently, the proceedings were closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Matter is settled in Adalath. Award is also passed. Hence proceedings closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pathakkutty Hajjumma
Party Age
61
Relation
D/o. Melatt Parambil Kunhikkoya
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Sadikh
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o. Cheriyamakkanakath Ibrahim
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.V. Ninthosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Seeking mandatory injunction and eviction
Evidence:
Matter is settled in Adalath. Award is also passed. Hence proceedings closed.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Seeking eviction of defendant
Evidence:
Matter is settled in Adalath. Award is also passed. Hence proceedings closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction and Eviction
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pathakkutty Hajjumma vs Muhammed Sadikh regarding mandatory injunction and eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Pathakkutty Hajjumma vs Muhammed Sadikh regarding mandatory injunction and eviction

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 08/12/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/12/2016 - 12:00
From
Mon, 08/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Wed, 08/31/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Puliyakkathodi Koitha et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Property Delivery Plaintiff Won
Case between Pelayam Parmabil Hamza and Kunhikrishnan et al regarding eviction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Eviction Defendant Won
Case between Shakkeela vs Kavumpurath Muhammedali et al regarding property possession
Court of Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunnathakath Kader Javid vs Kavumpuram Muhammed Shaji regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court at Tirur, Malappuram
Civil Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between M.T. Muhammed et al vs P.V. Abdul Nazar regarding license agreement and occupation
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction and Damages Plaintiff Won