| Niyamam AI

Displaying 661 - 665 of 21871

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Jose Babu vs Anil Prakash regarding impeachment of witness credit.

Criminal Case

S.T No. 83/2020

Vaikom

2025-08-13

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jose Babu vs Anil Prakash regarding recall of witness

Criminal Case

C.M.P.No.248/2025

Vaikom

2025-08-13

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited et al vs Vidhya et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.114/2024

Vaikom

2025-08-16

approximately-1 year 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ramesan P.A vs Kanakamani T.T regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

ST 59/2020

Vaikom

2025-08-19

approximately-6 years 7 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mathew C.M. vs Subichan P.K. regarding return of money advanced

Civil Suit

OS 31/2025

Vaikom

2025-08-22

approximately-2 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9635

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to prove their claims or the means of defendants.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment

Many petitions were dismissed for default because plaintiffs did not pay required fees or batta.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were frequently dismissed due to the petitioner's absence from court hearings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Steps Taken

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices or appearing in court.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Default Due to Non-Payment

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Steps Taken

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?