Case Summary
The plaintiff, Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited, represented by its Managing Director, is seeking repayment from the defendants Vidhya and Maneesh T.M for a loan taken by Vidhya. The defendants failed to repay the loan amount as per the agreed terms.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff’s firm is allowed to realize the plaint claim of ₹ 6,498/- and also to realize 9% interest from the defendants and their assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the claim for the repayment of the loan amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the evidence provided by the plaintiff unrebutted and upheld the claims made regarding the loan repayment.
The court found the evidence provided by the plaintiff unrebutted and upheld the claims made regarding the loan repayment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the evidence provided by the plaintiff unrebutted and upheld the claims made regarding the loan repayment.
The court found the evidence provided by the plaintiff unrebutted and upheld the claims made regarding the loan repayment.
Supporting Evidence
From the unrebutted evidence adduced by the plaintiff’s firm, I hold that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief as prayed for.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows:- The plaintiff’s firm is allowed to realize the plaint claim of ₹ 6,498/- (Rupees Six Thousand Four Hundred and Ninety Eight only) and also to realize 9% interest from the defendants and their assets from the date of the suit ie, 12.04.2024 till realization.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited
- Relation
- represented by its Managing Director C.K.Praveen
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vidhya
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- W/o Maneesh
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Maneesh T.M
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o Maniyan
Plaintiffs Documents
Resolution of the Director Board Meeting, Promissory Note, Lawyer’s Notice
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.G.Pradeepan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Chaithanya K.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Recovery of the amount due from the defendants with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff’s firm is allowed to realize the plaint claim of ₹ 6,498/- and also to realize 9% interest from the defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Resolution of Director Board meeting
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved the decision-making regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Promissory Note
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the loan taken by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the defendants for repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Returned notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned notices serve as evidence of the defendants' evasion.
Reference:
Exts.A4 and A5
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited et al vs Vidhya et al regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited et al vs Vidhya et al regarding realisation of money.