Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 31/2025

Case between Mathew C.M. vs Subichan P.K. regarding return of money advanced

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-08-22
Duration
approximately-2 years 3 months
Case Code No.
31
Case Closed
Fri, 08/22/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mathew C.M., advanced money to the defendant, Subichan P.K., for a business project that was never realized. After attempts to reclaim his money, the plaintiff approached the court for relief as the defendant failed to repay the amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover the amount advanced with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff’s firm is allowed to realize the plaint claim of ₹.4,99,750/- and also to realize 9% interest from the defendant and his assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover the amount advanced with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unrebutted evidence regarding the debt and the defendant's agreement to repay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided unrebutted evidence regarding the debt and the defendant's agreement to repay.
Supporting Evidence
From the unrebutted evidence adduced by plaintiff Bank, I hold that the plaintiff’s bank is entitled to the relief as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff’s firm is allowed to realize the plaint claim of ₹.4,99,750/-(Rupees Four Lakh Ninety Nine Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty only) and also to realize 9% interest from the defendant and his assets from the date of the suit ie, 15.02.2025 till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mathew C.M.
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subichan P.K.
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement dated 23.08.2024
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B.Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amal Jose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's claim for the return of ₹.4,99,750/- with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows:- The plaintiff’s firm is allowed to realize the plaint claim of ₹.4,99,750/-(Rupees Four Lakh Ninety Nine Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty only) and also to realize 9% interest from the defendant and his assets from the date of the suit ie, 15.02.2025 till realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original agreement dated 23.08.2024, wherein the defendant acknowledges the debt and agrees to repay it with interest.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Thu, 06/01/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/22/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Bharathy et al vs Shaju regarding declaration and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Vinod.S regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shaji et al vs Renjith Monai et al regarding a compromise petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Devaraj vs Sajimon regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between P.Padmakumari vs Sreeram.P.S. et al regarding realisation of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won