OS 136/2022

Case between Shaji et al vs Renjith Monai et al regarding a compromise petition.

Court

THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM

Judge

Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran

Order Date

2025-01-14

Duration

Case Code No.

136

Case Closed

Tue, 01/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shaji, represented by his legal heirs, filed a suit against Renjith Monai and others. The case involved a compromise petition that was found to be legally enforceable.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The case was decreed with the terms of the compromise forming part of the decree. All parties were directed to bear their own costs.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The case was decreed with the terms of the compromise forming part of the decree. All parties were directed to bear their own costs.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of compromise were found to be legally enforceable.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of compromise were found to be legally enforceable.

Supporting Evidence

Terms appears to be legally enforceable. Terms of compromise shall form part of the decree.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit accordingly decreed. Parties shall bear thereon costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Shaji
Party Age: 62
Relation: S/o.

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Iysha
Party Age: 60
Relation: W/o.

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Akhil Raj
Party Age: 31
Relation: S/o.

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Amal Shaji
Party Age: 24
Relation: S/o.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Renjith Monai
Party Age: 35
Relation: S/o.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rajimol
Party Age: 30
Relation: W/o.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sobhana
Party Age: 64
Relation: W/o.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Beena
Party Age: 58
Relation: W/o.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Santhosh.K.B.
Party Age: 57
Relation: S/o.

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: B.Biju
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: V.P.Joseph
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sabareenath Hariharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Suit accordingly decreed.

Evidence:

Terms appears to be legally enforceable.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification