Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Geetha and her children, sued the defendant Prabhakaran regarding a compromise agreement. The court found the terms of agreement to be lawful.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree in terms of compromise
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit based on the lawful compromise agreement. Each party is instructed to bear their own costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of agreement were found lawful.
The terms of agreement were found lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of agreement were found lawful.
The terms of agreement were found lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of agreement are found to be lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Geetha
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vishnu Mukundan
- Party Age
- 21
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Visakh Mukundan (Minor)
- Party Age
- 17
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prabhakaran
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.N.Jayachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A.X.Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise
Evidence:
Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2019