Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 676 - 680 of 3169

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Aayishu vs Ambalapprambil Yahu et al regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition 56/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-10

0 years, 0 months, 4 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Eengapadalil Kadeeja vs Chenganakkattil Abdurahman regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition 2463/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-10

0 years, 2 months, 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.Sethumadhavan vs Sainudheen regarding attachment order

Civil Suit

EP 57/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-10

2 years, 10 months, 8 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratary Perumanna Kalri Service Sahakarn Bank No.F.770 vs Naseer Poomadathil et al regarding default enquiry

Execution Petition

EP 107/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-10

0 years 8 months 28 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary perumanna Klari Service Sahakaran Bank No.F.770 vs Kunhimarakkar Poozithara regarding default on enquiry

Civil Suit - Execution Petition

EP 108/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-10

0 years, 8 months, 28 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,169 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1600
Defendant Won: 1076

1076

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required court fees, causing their petitions to be dismissed for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

A recurring issue was the absence of adequate evidence to prove the means of respondents, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to issue necessary notices to the respondents, leading to defaults.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Cases were commonly dismissed because the plaintiff did not appear in court, impacting the progress of the petition.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Notices

Absence of the Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?