| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3901 - 3905 of 21989

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Adiyath Ravindranath vs Santhosh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.707/2012

Ernakulam

2024-12-06

approximately-12 years 0 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Jayakrishnan V regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1162/2020

Ernakulam

2024-11-19

approximately-4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree DIV 8 NHG 9 Kudumbini et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 120/2024

Ernakulam

2024-11-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Mrs. Visala C.K regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.581/2024

Ernakulam

2024-11-20

approximately-0 years 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbashree Div 5 NHG 50 Alif et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 56/2024

Ernakulam

2024-11-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9686

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required batta fees leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Dismissing cases often stemmed from plaintiffs not providing sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Many cases were dismissed due to the failure to take steps in issuing required notices to defendants.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Absence of plaintiffs in court frequently led to petitions being dismissed for default.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Issue Notice

Non-Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?