Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1162/2020

Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Jayakrishnan V regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-11-19
Duration
approximately-4 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. is suing Jayakrishnan V for the recovery of a loan amount. Jayakrishnan failed to repay the loan, and the bank seeks to recover the outstanding amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to repay a total amount of ₹3,75,120.44 with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs as well.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An amount of ₹3,75,120.44 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence tendered by PW1 was uncontested and sufficient to prove the plaintiff's case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 3,75,120.44/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. (Age not specified years) Zonal Office, Pushpamangalam Estates, NH bye Pass, Edappally, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 025

Defendants

Jayakrishnan V (32 years) Palliampil (H), Chennithala P.O, Mavelikkara, Alappuzha – 690 105

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of 3,75,120.44/- with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 3,75,120.44/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of the Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the authority of the plaintiff to file the case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Preliminary Credit Facility Application form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to show the initial loan application submitted by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Credit Facility Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of the terms of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: True copy of the loan recall notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the demand for repayment made to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Computer generated loan account details
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the outstanding amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 11/19/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases