Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No.581/2024

Case between State Bank of India vs Mrs. Visala C.K regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-11-20
Duration
approximately-0 years 6 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff is State Bank of India, which claims that the defendant, Mrs. Visala C.K, failed to repay a loan. The defendant accumulated a debt of 4,47,572.62/- to the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the amount owed along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay ₹4,47,572.62/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the case through uncontested evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 4,47,572.62/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or her assets.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India (Age not specified years) KTDC Building, Shanmugam road, Ernakulam, PIN 682 011

Defendants

Mrs. Visala C.K (55 years years) Kalathil Kndakadavu Andikadavu, Chellanam, Kannamali, Ernakulam 682 008

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff the outstanding loan amount with interest.
Evidence:
I.The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 4,47,572.62/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or her assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff shall be at liberty to realise the amount from the defendant or her assets if payment is not made.
Evidence:
II.If the defendant do not pay the amount as ordered, the plaintiff shall be at the liberty to realise the same from the defendant or her assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
III.Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: X press Credit Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence to establish the loan taken by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Personal Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the loan agreement between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter outlining the terms of the loan arrangement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Appraisal cum Sanction Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the bank's appraisal and sanctioning of the loan to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Terms and Conditions of X press Credit insta top up loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Terms that were part of the loan documentation (subject to proof).
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Computer printout of Statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the transactional details of the loan and repayments.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certificate u/s. 65 B of the Evidence Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate confirming the admissibility of the computer generated statement.
Reference:
Ext.A6(a)
Document Type: Computer printout of Statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further transactional details of the loan and repayments.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certificate u/s. 65 B of the Evidence Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Additional certificate confirming admissibility of another computer generated statement.
Reference:
Ext.A7(a)
Document Type: Photo copy of the Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the defendant regarding the outstanding dues.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt confirming the sending of the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Copy of Postal track consignment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the postal dispatch of the lawyer's notice (subject to proof).
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Irrevocable standing instruction given by the borrower to the Bank
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Instruction related to the loan repayment mechanism set by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 05/04/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases