Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.707/2012

Case between Adiyath Ravindranath vs Santhosh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-12-06
Duration
approximately-12 years 0 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Adiyath Ravindranath filed a suit against Santhosh for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain him from demolishing a compound wall on the plaint schedule property. The case involves allegations of interference with the petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for adjournment filed by the plaintiff, finding no merit as the case was over 10 years old and there was no direction or stay issued by the higher court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court concluded that the petition was intended to delay proceedings without merit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition is dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, parties are directed to bear their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Adiyath Ravindranath (Age not specified years) Swami Sadan, Market Road, Thripunithura, Nadama Desom, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Thripunithura P O, Pin-682301, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Santhosh (Age not specified years) Pathadath House, Vallilam Kara, Kalamasserry, Thrikkakara North Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Request to adjourn the ongoing suits to obtain further evidence.
Evidence:
Therefore the court is satisfied that this petition is intended only to protract the matter and hence there is no merits in the petition.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
No. 3219/1999
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Requested as part of the evidence to be submitted.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2012 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases