| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3736 - 3740 of 21921

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Beny Joy vs The Head Load and General Workers Union (CITU) et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and ancillary reliefs

Civil Suit

OS No. 10 / 2024

2024-06-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between PEPCO vs P. P Corporation regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

os. No.20/2018

Kolenchery

2024-03-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ammini et al vs Ajitha Sunil et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

OS No. 10/2021

Kolenchery, Ernakulam

2024-05-31

approximately-3 years 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ramdas vs Surendran et al regarding mandatory injunction for correction of sale deed.

Civil Suit

OS No. 39 / 2021

2024-05-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between PEPCO vs P. P Corporation regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS No 20/2018

Kolenchery, Kerala

2024-03-01

approximately-5 years 10 months 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9656

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to not paying necessary court fees or costs, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Dismissing cases due to plaintiffs' failure to issue required notices to respondents was a prevalent issue.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Several petitions were dismissed due to the absence of plaintiffs during court proceedings.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Issue Notice

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?