Case Summary
The plaintiff, Ramdas, filed a suit against the defendants for a mandatory injunction to correct a mistake in a sale deed regarding property he had purchased. The defendants failed to provide a written statement or appear in the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory injunction to execute a correction deed.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mistake in the sale deed was determined to be a bona fide mistake from both parties' sides.
The mistake in the sale deed was determined to be a bona fide mistake from both parties' sides.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to get a mandatory injunction and the defendants shall rectify the mistake in the sale deed by executing a correction deed between the plaintiff and the defendants.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Ramdas (50 years years)
Vettikkanalpadickal House, Vadayampady P.O, Vadayampady Kara, Poothrikka Panchayath, Aikkaranadu South Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Pin: 682308
Defendants
Surendran (54 years years)
Vattapparambil House, Vadayampady P.O, Vadayampady Kara, Poothrikka Panchayath, Aikkaranadu South Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk
Sasidharan Nair (64 years years)
Vattapparambil House, Vadayampady P.O, Vadayampady Kara, Poothrikka Panchayath, Aikkaranadu South Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk
Mohanan (62 years years)
Vattapparambil House, Vadayampady P.O, Vadayampady Kara, Poothrikka Panchayath, Aikkaranadu South Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff requested a mandatory injunction to correct a mistake in the sale deed.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get a mandatory injunction and the defendants shall rectify the mistake in the sale deed by executing a correction deed between the plaintiff and the defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is the sale deed through which the plaintiff acquired the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Partition Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides relevant background regarding the ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
It serves as evidence of the plaintiff's possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff provided oral testimony in support of the claims made in the suit.
Reference: