Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS No 20/2018

Case between PEPCO vs P. P Corporation regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF AT KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha N A
Order Date
2024-03-01
Duration
approximately-5 years 10 months 19 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, PEPCO, filed a suit against the defendant, P. P Corporation, for the realization of money. The suit was filed under the Code of Civil Procedure, claiming a sum of ₹201,891.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the defendant to pay ₹2,01,891 with interest at 12% per annum from the date of the suit until realization. The plaintiff was not granted costs in this case.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant shall pay ₹2,01,891/- with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved the claim for realization of money.

Judgment Evidence:

a) The defendant shall pay ₹2,01,891/- (Rupees Two Lakhs One Thousand Eight Hundred and Ninety One only) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit till realization.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Thomas Yacob (82 years) Cherattumoolayil House, Kokkappilly Kara, Kokkappilly P O., Thiruvaniyoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Ajith Kumar (52 years) Mohanvilla, Vazhappilly West P O., Vazhappilly Village, Changanassery Thaluk, Annapoorneswary Road, Changanassery, PIN - - 686103

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant was ordered to pay ₹2,01,891/- with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant shall pay ₹2,01,891/- (Rupees Two Lakhs One Thousand Eight Hundred and Ninety One only) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit till realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff was not entitled to costs in the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is not entitled to costs in the suit, considering the nature of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents from the plaintiff were marked and referred to during the hearing.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A21

Quick Facts

Location
Kolenchery, Kerala
Case Filed
Thu, 04/12/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases