Case Summary
The plaintiff, PEPCO, filed a suit against the defendant, P. P Corporation, for the realization of money. The suit was filed under the Code of Civil Procedure, claiming a sum of ₹201,891.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant shall pay ₹2,01,891/- with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the defendant to pay ₹2,01,891 with interest at 12% per annum from the date of the suit until realization. The plaintiff was not granted costs in this case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved the claim for realization of money.
The plaintiff successfully proved the claim for realization of money.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved the claim for realization of money.
The plaintiff successfully proved the claim for realization of money.
Supporting Evidence
After perusing the plaint and other records and after hearing plaintiff side, this court on 01.03.2024 day doth order and decree as follows:
Judgment Evidence:
a) The defendant shall pay ₹2,01,891/- (Rupees Two Lakhs One Thousand Eight Hundred and Ninety One only) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit till realization.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- PEPCO
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P. P Corporation
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Plaint, Ext. A1 to A21
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M Y Saju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R Sivakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant was ordered to pay ₹2,01,891/- with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant shall pay ₹2,01,891/- (Rupees Two Lakhs One Thousand Eight Hundred and Ninety One only) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit till realization.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff was not entitled to costs in the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is not entitled to costs in the suit, considering the nature of the suit.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Document
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents from the plaintiff were marked and referred to during the hearing.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A21
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between PEPCO vs P. P Corporation regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between PEPCO vs P. P Corporation regarding realization of money