| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18211 - 18215 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Peringottukara Yogakshema Sabha vs U.V.Shaji et al regarding Execution Proceedings

Execution Proceedings

EP 22/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-07-24

1 years, 6 months, 2 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ummusalma vs Koorkoli Abdu Haji et al regarding injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 44 OF 2017

2019-07-24

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Karimbanakkal Kunhimoideenkutty's children vs Chenadanpalam Thodi Sidheeq regarding rent control petition.

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 33 OF 2017

Tirur Taluk

2019-07-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Beepathu vs Ashraf et al regarding permission to sue as indigent persons

Original Petition

ORIGINAL PETITION (Pauper)No. 102 OF 2016

2019-07-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Asir. M vs Kunhu Mohammed. P regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No:29/2018

Tirur

2019-07-26

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees, leading to dismissals for default due to non-payment of batta.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many petitions were dismissed because plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence regarding the means of the respondents.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Absence

Several cases were dismissed solely due to the absence of the petitioner, highlighting representation issues.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Petitioners often failed to undertake necessary steps to issue notices, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default Due to Absence

Failure to Issue Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?