Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL PETITION (Pauper)No. 102 OF 2016

Case between Beepathu vs Ashraf et al regarding permission to sue as indigent persons

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-24
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Beepathu and Hafseena, petitioners, are seeking permission to sue for damages caused by the respondents, members of the CPI (M). They claim the respondents trespassed into their house and caused significant damage and loss.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for permission to sue as indigent persons, stating that the petitioners do not have sufficient means to pay the court fees required.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners were found to be indigent and unable to pay the requisite court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed. The petition shall be numbered as plaint as O.S. No. /2019.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Beepathu (62 years) Niramaruthoor amsom desom, Tirur Taluk. P.O. Niramaruthoor Hafseena (24 years) Kammuttakath House, Unnial, Tanur

Defendants

Ashraf (38 years) Kakkante Purakkal Unnial, Tanur Usman (36 years) Kakkante Purakkal Unnial, Tanur Shabeer (28 years) Kakkante Purakkal Unnial, Tanur Shihab (27 years) Kakkante Purakkal Unnial, Tanur Harshad (26 years) Kakkante Purakkal Unnial, Tanur

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission to sue as indigent persons.
Evidence:
Therefore, I am satisfied that the petitioners have not possessed of sufficient means to enable them to pay the court fee prescribed by law for the plaint in the suit. Hence, the petitioner is entitled for the relief claimed in the petition.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases