Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL PETITION (PAUPER) No. 5 OF 2017

Case between Jameela vs Irshad et al regarding permission to sue as indigent person.

Court
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-10-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jameela filed a petition seeking permission to sue as an indigent person against Irshad and others for damages caused by the respondents, who allegedly trespassed into her house and set fire to her motorcycle, among other damages. The respondents are workers of CPI (M) while the petitioner is a sympathizer of Indian Union Muslim League.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, granting the petitioner's request to sue as an indigent person due to a lack of sufficient means to pay court fees. The petitioner proved her financial incapacity to pay the court fee required for filing a suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition, granting the petitioner's request to sue as an indigent person due to a lack of sufficient means to pay court fees. The petitioner proved her financial incapacity to pay the court fee required for filing a suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner demonstrated that she does not possess sufficient means to pay the requisite court fee.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner demonstrated that she does not possess sufficient means to pay the requisite court fee.
Supporting Evidence
Therefore, I am satisfied that the petitioner has not possessed of sufficient means to enable them to pay the court fee prescribed by law for the plaint in the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed. The petition shall be numbered as plaint as O.S. No. /2019.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jameela
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Irshad
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anas
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Afsal
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Farshad
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shoukathali
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C.Nandakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Muhammed Zakkaria.A.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.I.V.Rathish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Basheer.P.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission to sue as indigent person.
Evidence:
Therefore, I am satisfied that the petitioner has not possessed of sufficient means to enable them to pay the court fee prescribed by law for the plaint in the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jameela vs Irshad et al regarding permission to sue as indigent person.
Case Code Year
Case between Jameela vs Irshad et al regarding permission to sue as indigent person.

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram Dist
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Suhara vs Rasheed regarding permission to sue as indigent person.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dileep kumar vs K.V.Sindhu regarding permission to sue as in forma pauperis
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Seema Ala.K vs The General Convenor, Programme Committee et al regarding Original Petit No. 6 of 2018
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Original Petition Defendant Won
Case between Beepathu vs Ashraf et al regarding permission to sue as indigent persons
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenivasn vs Sasidharan et al regarding Petition filed u/o 26 Rule 1 and u/o 33 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Petition Unknown