Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL PETITION (PAUPER) No. 27 OF 2018

Case between Suhara vs Rasheed regarding permission to sue as indigent person.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-11-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Suhara, the petitioner, seeks permission to sue Rasheed as an indigent person. She claims that she has paid part of the sale consideration for property but the respondent failed to execute the deed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, permitting the petitioner to sue as an indigent person.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition, permitting the petitioner to sue as an indigent person.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved she is not possessed of sufficient means to enable her to pay the court fee.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner proved she is not possessed of sufficient means to enable her to pay the court fee.
Supporting Evidence
There is nothing on record to show that the petitioner has disposed of any property within a period of six months prior to the filing of this petition. I find no reason to disbelieve the case of the petitioner. Therefore, I am satisfied that the petitioner has not possessed of sufficient means to enable them to pay the court fee prescribed by law for the plaint in the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed. The petition shall be numbered as plaint as O.S. No. 351/2019.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suhara
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rasheed
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.Najmudheen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C. P. Jamshid Rahman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Suresh Karthala
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission to sue as an indigent person.
Evidence:
Therefore, I am satisfied that the petitioner has not possessed of sufficient means to enable them to pay the court fee prescribed by law for the plaint in the suit. Hence, the petitioner is entitled for the relief claimed in the petition.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suhara vs Rasheed regarding permission to sue as indigent person.
Case Code Year
Case between Suhara vs Rasheed regarding permission to sue as indigent person.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jameela vs Irshad et al regarding permission to sue as indigent person.
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dileep kumar vs K.V.Sindhu regarding permission to sue as in forma pauperis
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Seema Ala.K vs The General Convenor, Programme Committee et al regarding Original Petit No. 6 of 2018
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Original Petition Defendant Won
Case between Beepathu vs Ashraf et al regarding permission to sue as indigent persons
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenivasn vs Sasidharan et al regarding Petition filed u/o 26 Rule 1 and u/o 33 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Petition Unknown