Case Summary
Peringottukara Yogakshema Sabha is the decree holder, while U.V.Shaji and others are the judgment debtors. The case involved execution proceedings that ultimately led to a dismissal due to lack of action.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Proceedings
Final Judgment
No
The execution proceedings were dismissed due to no steps being taken by the decree holder.
Key Reasoning:
No formal steps were taken by the decree holder to pursue the execution proceedings.
No formal steps were taken by the decree holder to pursue the execution proceedings.
Why Defendant Won:
No formal steps were taken by the decree holder to pursue the execution proceedings.
No formal steps were taken by the decree holder to pursue the execution proceedings.
Supporting Evidence
No steps taken by the decree holder in the execution proceedings led to the dismissal.
Judgment Evidence:
No steps taken. EP dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Peringottukara Yogakshema Sabha
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- U.V.Shaji
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.Kabeer
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M.Mohammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T.Mohanan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.Bhavesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- appearing for U.V.Shaji: Advocate
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- appearing for 2,3, 4 respectively.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Proceedings
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2018