Case Summary
Complainant Asir. M filed a complaint against the accused Kunhu Mohammed. P for an offense under the Negotiable Instrument Act. The complainant later sought to withdraw the complaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the complainant to withdraw the case, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
In this result, the accused is acquitted. Under section 257 Cr. P.C. His bail bond stands canceled and he is set at liberty.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Asir. M
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhu Mohammed. P
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M Abdul Kadhar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C. Vijayaraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint.
Evidence:
the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complainant.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The accused is acquitted.
Evidence:
the accused is acquitted.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Asir. M vs Kunhu Mohammed. P regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act
Case Code Year
Case between Asir. M vs Kunhu Mohammed. P regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act