| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17366 - 17370 of 22062

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Ramachandran Valiyil et al vs Manmeet Singh Pahwa regarding rental dispute

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 149/2022

Ernakulam

2025-03-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between TATA Realty and Infrastructure Ltd. vs Tritvam Apartment Owners’ Association et al regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 99/2022

Ernakulam

2025-03-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mathew James et al vs Upayog Nidhi Limited regarding dismissal as not pressed

Civil Suit

O.S No . 229/2024

Ernakulam

2025-03-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Joy vs Johnny et al regarding dismissal of suit for default.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 331 /2017

2025-03-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Hi Tech Diagnostic Centre vs Vishnupriya V. et al regarding non-prosecution of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1520/2019

Ernakulam

2025-03-04

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9724

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta or Fees

Plaintiffs failed to pay the necessary court fees or batta, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to establish their claims or the means of the respondents.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Cases were often dismissed due to the plaintiffs not appearing in court at the scheduled hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs neglected to take steps to issue necessary notices to the respondents, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta or Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?