Case Summary
Mathew James and Sali P. Simson are the plaintiffs in this case against Upayog Nidhi Limited. The case was dismissed because the plaintiffs did not press the matter further.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mathew James
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sali P. Simson
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Upayog Nidhi Limited.
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R. Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sibi Karun
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Dismissed as not pressed.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
I.A 2/25 was allowed.
Evidence:
I.A 2/25 allowed (vide separate Order).
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mathew James et al vs Upayog Nidhi Limited regarding dismissal as not pressed
Case Code Year
Case between Mathew James et al vs Upayog Nidhi Limited regarding dismissal as not pressed