Case Summary
The plaintiff Joy was absent during the hearing while the defendants were represented. The court found that the plaintiff did not intend to proceed with the suit and dismissed it for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of intention to proceed.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not appear for the hearing and did not intend to proceed with the suit.
Plaintiff did not appear for the hearing and did not intend to proceed with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff did not appear for the hearing and did not intend to proceed with the suit.
Plaintiff did not appear for the hearing and did not intend to proceed with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
No proof affidavit seen filed, nor plaintiff is present.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence satisfied that plaintiff is not intending to proceed with the suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Joy
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Johnny
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fr. George Neereveettil
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Elsy George
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mary
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rosily Antony
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Antony Joseph Mariadas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R Ajithkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- George A Cherian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Latha Susan Cherian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Tissarant H G
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Innocent Francis Papali
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence satisfied that plaintiff is not intending to proceed with the suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Joy vs Johnny et al regarding dismissal of suit for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Joy vs Johnny et al regarding dismissal of suit for default.