Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 99/2022

Case between TATA Realty and Infrastructure Ltd. vs Tritvam Apartment Owners’ Association et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-03
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves TATA Realty and Infrastructure Ltd. as the plaintiff and Tritvam Apartment Owners’ Association along with its office bearers as defendants. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of readiness for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and present evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's failure to appear and present evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The defendants did not have to defend against the claim as the plaintiff failed to show up.
Why Defendant Won:
The defendants did not have to defend against the claim as the plaintiff failed to show up.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff not present or ready or present for evidence in listed case. Dismissed.

Judgment Evidence:

The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of readiness for evidence.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
TATA Realty and Infrastructure Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tritvam Apartment Owners’ Association
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dean K. Mathew
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindu Elizabeth George
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abraham Joseph Markos
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alexander Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sharad Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Isaac Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Chandapillai Abraham P.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Johnson Gomez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S. Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sanjay Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
John Gomez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sreedevi. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dinoop P. D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between TATA Realty and Infrastructure Ltd. vs Tritvam Apartment Owners’ Association et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between TATA Realty and Infrastructure Ltd. vs Tritvam Apartment Owners’ Association et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won